From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754956Ab2GQJrC (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:47:02 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:36887 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753057Ab2GQJrA (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:47:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:50:16 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Jon Masters , Pavel Machek , Catalin Marinas , Ingo Molnar , Olof Johansson , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Russell King , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port Message-ID: <20120717105016.3ade44d3@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <201207170802.56434.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1341608777-12982-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <20120716121651.GA18859@elf.ucw.cz> <50050ECE.8020100@jonmasters.org> <201207170802.56434.arnd@arndb.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Right, I would say that with any CPU core more powerful than this one > or with more than a few of these, you will also have trouble coming > up with workloads that really require the CPU performance but don't > also require a 64 bit virtual address space in either user space > or kernel. There are lots of them - soft radio for example can burn near infinite CPU resource depending upon the amount you are fishing out, but its pure throughput. Alan