From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755108Ab2GQO7J (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:59:09 -0400 Received: from smtp.witbe.net ([81.88.96.48]:43168 "EHLO smtp.witbe.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752358Ab2GQO7G (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:59:06 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 3744 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:59:06 EDT Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:55:39 +0200 From: Paul Rolland (=?UTF-8?B?44Od44O844Or44O744Ot44Op44Oz?=) To: Terry Phelps Cc: Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rol@witbe.net Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Can ping address, but traceroute gets ENETDOWN Message-ID: <20120717155539.1a6dbfc4@tux.DEF.witbe.net> In-Reply-To: References: <1342531849.2626.605.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Organization: Witbe.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.7; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Ncc-RegId: fr.witbe X-Face: +^rP^g;Vjb!M*"%3$mF6xWU{DwwAx)W=b_}?Y)|*X<5cv@M`1P{\:)p9_:$=)(NY2`%AcypV*]z>YIyy5yY"9PUoV5@)*(W:S5e-48Ct7Wu6CkkO[=KB"ox,_2B/FwY&hr/E1H&<9IbOCx6NrBa"}FLA)UIvHg`9%NC\LfYB3ia] Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/5c6FQME0cZ162MrXPMlWKYa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/5c6FQME0cZ162MrXPMlWKYa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:41:27 -0400 Terry Phelps wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Eric Dumazet > wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 09:04 -0400, Terry Phelps wrote: > >> socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) =3D 3 > >> setsockopt(3, SOL_IP, IP_MTU_DISCOVER, [0], 4) =3D 0 > >> setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP, [1], 4) =3D 0 > >> fcntl(3, F_SETFL, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) =3D 0 > >> setsockopt(3, SOL_IP, IP_TTL, [1], 4) =3D 0 > >> setsockopt(3, SOL_IP, IP_RECVERR, [1], 4) =3D 0 > >> connect(3, {sa_family=3DAF_INET, sin_port=3Dhtons(33434), > >> sin_addr=3Dinet_addr("192.168.118.22")}, 28) =3D 0 > >> sendto(3, "@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\\]^_"..., 40, 0, NULL, 0) =3D = -1 > >> ENETDOWN (Network is down) ENETDOWN should mean your interface is no more in the UP status. Could it be you have some processes running that could turn down and up your interfaces ? Anything in /var/log/messages about eth0 ? Paul --Sig_/5c6FQME0cZ162MrXPMlWKYa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAFbtsACgkQZP464AVDf+CQTwCff/bQcjlSnkNXRm46L+yuh1ER W3UAnRuZm40FT1V8Gc9WL6uCUjalVAKp =dTKj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/5c6FQME0cZ162MrXPMlWKYa--