From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751329Ab2GSNjw (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:39:52 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:60275 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750743Ab2GSNjs (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:39:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:39:48 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Cc: msb@chromium.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shaohua.li@intel.com, yinghai@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, cl@gentwo.org, olofj@chromium.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Alex Shi , Conny Seidel Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, mm: Send tlb flush IPIs to online cpus only Message-ID: <20120719133948.GA10050@x1.osrc.amd.com> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , msb@chromium.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shaohua.li@intel.com, yinghai@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, cl@gentwo.org, olofj@chromium.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Alex Shi , Conny Seidel References: <20120719125643.30033.58913.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> <20120719133229.GB10073@x1.osrc.amd.com> <50080D37.3000808@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50080D37.3000808@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:05:51PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > Oh.. ok.. Then this patch is perhaps unnecessary.. Thanks for the > info! Probably, if the TLB flushrange set from Alex goes upstream in the next merge window... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.