mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: fix pwr_btn_event_pending build error
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 19:40:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207221940.51764.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120722041038.GN2435@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Sunday, July 22, 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 03:08:40AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:37:14PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:52:43AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:41:56PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > Hello!
> > > > > 
> > > > > A recent build for KVM on x86 resulted in the following build error:
> > > > > 
> > > > > drivers/acpi/sleep.c:60:13: warning: ‘pwr_btn_event_pending’ defined but not
> > > > > +used [-Wunused-variable]
> > > > > 
> > > > > This patch silences this error.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > > index 8856102..18347aa 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > > @@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
> > > > >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
> > > > >  
> > > > >  static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
> > > > >  static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
> > > > > +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP */
> > > > 
> > > > __maybe_unused ?
> > > 
> > > Are the compiler and linker smart enough to get rid of the storage in
> > > case it really isn't used?  (Not that the storage for a bool is worth
> > > worrying about, but...)
> > 
> > GCC with optimization enabled will get rid of the storage even without
> > __maybe_unused.
> 
> OK, that should allow me to get rid of a few ifdefs, then!  For this one,
> please see below.
> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> acpi: fix pwr_btn_event_pending build error
> 
> A recent build for KVM on x86 resulted in the following build error:
> 
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c:60:13: warning: ‘pwr_btn_event_pending’ defined but not
> +used [-Wunused-variable]
> 
> This patch silences this error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>

Well, I prefer the one below.

Thanks,
Rafael

---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: ACPI / PM: Fix build warning in sleep.c for CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP unset

If CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is unset, the compiler complains that
pwr_btn_event_pending is defined but not used.  To silence the
warning, move the definition of pwr_btn_event_pending under an
apprporiate #ifdef.

Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
 drivers/acpi/sleep.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
 
 static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
-static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
 
 static void acpi_sleep_tts_switch(u32 acpi_state)
 {
@@ -110,6 +109,7 @@ static int acpi_sleep_prepare(u32 acpi_s
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
 static u32 acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
+static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
 
 /*
  * The ACPI specification wants us to save NVS memory regions during hibernation

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-22 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-21 21:41 Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-21 21:52 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2012-07-21 23:37   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-22  0:08     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2012-07-22  4:10       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-22 17:40         ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-07-22 20:28           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-23 18:58             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-23 19:01             ` [Resend][PATCH] ACPI / PM: Fix build warning in sleep.c for CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP unset Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-23 19:29               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-26 23:28                 ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201207221940.51764.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®