From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752994Ab2GZWxS (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:53:18 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:49643 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752729Ab2GZWxQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:53:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:56:51 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Greg KH Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jiri Slaby , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: No big TTY/serial patch merge for 3.6-rc1 Message-ID: <20120726235651.28a44eb1@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120726212807.GA9049@kroah.com> References: <20120726190814.GA2194@kroah.com> <20120726222313.5993a550@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <20120726212807.GA9049@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:28:07 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:23:13PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:08:14 -0700 > > Greg KH wrote: > > > > > tty: Move the handling of the tty release logic > > > > Can we lose that one specifically. I've chased down Ian Abbotts problem > > and replicated it and that is the offending patch not the lock localise > > (which still needs to be kept out as it depends upon this one) > > > > I have it fixed but it's not had enough testing for -rc1 and moving the > > termios data has enough spectacular hits all drivers fallout for 3.6 > > Yes, I can go revert it. I'm working on building up a small tty-linus > branch at the moment for just the "must haves" for 3.6. Right now it's > just 10 patches listed below. Any objection to me sending these after > a round trip through linux-next? All look good to me