From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen/swiotlb: If iommu=soft was not passed in on > 4GB, don't turn it on.
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:55:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120727175546.GH17427@andromeda.dapyr.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1207271204500.26163@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:06:27PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > If we boot a 64-bit guest with more than 4GB memory, the SWIOTLB
> > gets turned on:
> > PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
> > software IO TLB [mem 0xfb43d000-0xff43cfff] (64MB) mapped at [ffff8800fb43d000-ffff8800ff43cfff]
> >
> > which is OK if we had PCI devices, but not if we did not. In a PV
> > guest the SWIOTLB ends up asking the hypervisor for precious lowmem
> > memory - and 64MB of it per guest. On a 32GB machine, this limits the
> > amount of guests that are 4GB to start due to lowmem exhaustion.
> >
> > What we do is detect whether the user supplied e820_hole=1
> > parameter, which is used to construct an E820 that is similar to
> > the machine - so that the PCI regions do not overlap with RAM regions.
> > We check for that by looking at the E820 and seeing if it diverges
> > from the standard - and if so (and if iommu=soft was not turned on),
> > we disable the check pci_swiotlb_detect_4gb code.
>
> What kind of paramter is it?
> Is it a Linux cmdline paramter? Or maybe a Xen toolstack parameter?
Its a guest config option.
>
> Surely there must be a better way to let Linux know if this paramter has
> been turned on than looking for ACPI entries in the E820.
I am all open for suggestions. The best way I can think of is to have
some early_init variant of XenBus-detect-this-backend-parameter. Can
one unhook an "old" XenBus and reset with the full-fledged XenBus
init later on?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-27 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-26 20:43 [RFC PATCH] Xen-SWIOTLB fixes (v1) for 3.7 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-26 20:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen/swiotlb: If iommu=soft was not passed in on > 4GB, don't turn it on Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-27 7:27 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-07-27 17:54 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-30 7:06 ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-27 11:06 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 17:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-07-30 14:58 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-30 15:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-26 20:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen/swiotlb: If user supplied e820_hole=1 in the guest config, enable SWIOTLB Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120727175546.GH17427@andromeda.dapyr.net \
--to=konrad@darnok.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®