From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754077Ab2G3QBt (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:01:49 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:39237 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753491Ab2G3QBs (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:01:48 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 2XDWUrRMXMcSgtJ4YrfqKGPf6ljf4Ssbwqy9+wgF/uAV 1343664107 Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:01:46 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Singh Sandeep-B37400 Cc: Francois Romieu , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "galak@kernel.crashing.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [2/3][PATCH][v2] TDM Framework Message-ID: <20120730160146.GB28703@kroah.com> References: <1343397940-12975-1-git-send-email-sandeep@freescale.com> <20120727152542.GB1613@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <3F1D9DCAAB49B94D88DBE05911FA4E6E511121@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F1D9DCAAB49B94D88DBE05911FA4E6E511121@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:50:57AM +0000, Singh Sandeep-B37400 wrote: > 1. You should send some kernel mode TDM clients. Without those the framework > is pretty useless. > [Sandeep] We do have a test client but not good enough to be pushed in > open source, should we add it to documentation?? Then how do you know if the framework is "correct" and good enough for real clients? We don't add frameworks, or apis, to the kernel without users, so you will have to come up with some users before we can accept it. greg k-h