From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753677Ab2GaRmt (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:42:49 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:49078 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753587Ab2GaRms (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:42:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:42:49 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , Thierry Reding Subject: Re: awful kconfig help texts. Message-ID: <20120731174249.GB4735@x1.osrc.amd.com> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , Steven Rostedt , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , Thierry Reding References: <20120731151600.GA19412@redhat.com> <20120731170741.GA4735@x1.osrc.amd.com> <20120731172638.GE16873@home.goodmis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120731172638.GE16873@home.goodmis.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 01:26:38PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Then shouldn't this not have a prompt and just be selected by those > PWM drivers below? It gives an empty menu due to the deps of the single PWM drivers. But the whole CONFIG_PWM thing should simply depend on !X86 so that it doesn't appear in drivers/. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.