From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754062Ab2HAJ0a (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2012 05:26:30 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:41991 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751858Ab2HAJ02 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2012 05:26:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:26:25 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Thierry Reding , Steven Rostedt , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: awful kconfig help texts. Message-ID: <20120801092625.GB21303@liondog.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , Lars-Peter Clausen , Thierry Reding , Steven Rostedt , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel References: <20120731151600.GA19412@redhat.com> <20120731170741.GA4735@x1.osrc.amd.com> <20120731172638.GE16873@home.goodmis.org> <20120731174249.GB4735@x1.osrc.amd.com> <20120801074742.GH29673@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> <20120801085644.GA21303@liondog.tnic> <5018F537.209@metafoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5018F537.209@metafoo.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:21:59AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > One major reason for the new PWM framework is to be able to support > arch independent PWM drivers, like those for companion chips with PWM > capabilities. Restricting the config option to certain architectures > wouldn't work. Right, but when I enable the CONFIG_PWM option on x86, I don't see any drivers there. So the logical thing to do would be to hide that option on arches which don't have such chips. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.