From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: save 8bytes in 'struct dev_pm_info'
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:27:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208071327.19648.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344308278-23211-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>
On Tuesday, August 07, 2012, Ming Lei wrote:
> On ARMv7, sizeof(struct dev_pm_info) becomes 344Bytes from 352Bytes
> after applying the patch which only changes fields' order, so we can
> save 8bytes per device. Nothing in behaviour changed.
>
> GCC: gcc version 4.5.1
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
While I have no fundamental objections against this patch, I see that it
will conflict with some other patches changing struct dev_pm_info.
For this reason, if I apply it at all, I'll do that when my pull request for
v3.7 is practically ready.
Thanks,
Rafael
> ---
> include/linux/pm.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
> index f067e60..f116d40 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
> @@ -505,11 +505,6 @@ struct pm_subsys_data {
>
> struct dev_pm_info {
> pm_message_t power_state;
> - unsigned int can_wakeup:1;
> - unsigned int async_suspend:1;
> - bool is_prepared:1; /* Owned by the PM core */
> - bool is_suspended:1; /* Ditto */
> - bool ignore_children:1;
> spinlock_t lock;
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> struct list_head entry;
> @@ -519,13 +514,12 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
> #else
> unsigned int should_wakeup:1;
> #endif
> + unsigned int can_wakeup:1;
> + unsigned int async_suspend:1;
> + bool is_prepared:1; /* Owned by the PM core */
> + bool is_suspended:1; /* Ditto */
> + bool ignore_children:1;
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> - struct timer_list suspend_timer;
> - unsigned long timer_expires;
> - struct work_struct work;
> - wait_queue_head_t wait_queue;
> - atomic_t usage_count;
> - atomic_t child_count;
> unsigned int disable_depth:3;
> unsigned int idle_notification:1;
> unsigned int request_pending:1;
> @@ -538,6 +532,12 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
> unsigned int timer_autosuspends:1;
> enum rpm_request request;
> enum rpm_status runtime_status;
> + struct timer_list suspend_timer;
> + unsigned long timer_expires;
> + struct work_struct work;
> + wait_queue_head_t wait_queue;
> + atomic_t usage_count;
> + atomic_t child_count;
> int runtime_error;
> int autosuspend_delay;
> unsigned long last_busy;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-07 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-07 2:57 Ming Lei
2012-08-07 11:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201208071327.19648.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®