mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: save 8bytes in 'struct dev_pm_info'
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:27:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208071327.19648.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344308278-23211-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>

On Tuesday, August 07, 2012, Ming Lei wrote:
> On ARMv7, sizeof(struct dev_pm_info) becomes 344Bytes from 352Bytes
> after applying the patch which only changes fields' order, so we can
> save 8bytes per device. Nothing in behaviour changed.
> 
> GCC: gcc version 4.5.1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>

While I have no fundamental objections against this patch, I see that it
will conflict with some other patches changing struct dev_pm_info.

For this reason, if I apply it at all, I'll do that when my pull request for
v3.7 is practically ready.

Thanks,
Rafael


> ---
>  include/linux/pm.h |   22 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
> index f067e60..f116d40 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
> @@ -505,11 +505,6 @@ struct pm_subsys_data {
>  
>  struct dev_pm_info {
>  	pm_message_t		power_state;
> -	unsigned int		can_wakeup:1;
> -	unsigned int		async_suspend:1;
> -	bool			is_prepared:1;	/* Owned by the PM core */
> -	bool			is_suspended:1;	/* Ditto */
> -	bool			ignore_children:1;
>  	spinlock_t		lock;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  	struct list_head	entry;
> @@ -519,13 +514,12 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
>  #else
>  	unsigned int		should_wakeup:1;
>  #endif
> +	unsigned int		can_wakeup:1;
> +	unsigned int		async_suspend:1;
> +	bool			is_prepared:1;	/* Owned by the PM core */
> +	bool			is_suspended:1;	/* Ditto */
> +	bool			ignore_children:1;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> -	struct timer_list	suspend_timer;
> -	unsigned long		timer_expires;
> -	struct work_struct	work;
> -	wait_queue_head_t	wait_queue;
> -	atomic_t		usage_count;
> -	atomic_t		child_count;
>  	unsigned int		disable_depth:3;
>  	unsigned int		idle_notification:1;
>  	unsigned int		request_pending:1;
> @@ -538,6 +532,12 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
>  	unsigned int		timer_autosuspends:1;
>  	enum rpm_request	request;
>  	enum rpm_status		runtime_status;
> +	struct timer_list	suspend_timer;
> +	unsigned long		timer_expires;
> +	struct work_struct	work;
> +	wait_queue_head_t	wait_queue;
> +	atomic_t		usage_count;
> +	atomic_t		child_count;
>  	int			runtime_error;
>  	int			autosuspend_delay;
>  	unsigned long		last_busy;
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2012-08-07 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-07  2:57 Ming Lei
2012-08-07 11:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201208071327.19648.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®