From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752859Ab2HKIgj (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Aug 2012 04:36:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45002 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752664Ab2HKIge (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Aug 2012 04:36:34 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:36:31 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20120811.173631.454801705875075594.yamato@redhat.com> To: jan.ceuleers@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry From: Masatake YAMATO In-Reply-To: <50255DF9.4040503@gmail.com> References: <20120810.230559.1897275934845172399.yamato@redhat.com> <50255393.7070400@gmail.com> <50255DF9.4040503@gmail.com> Organization: Red Hat Japan, Inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On 08/10/2012 08:31 PM, Jan Ceuleers wrote: >> Two points: >> >> - I haven't seen patch 01/15; > > Correction: I have. > >> - these patches should go to netdev rather than lkml > > But this is still the case; MAINTAINERS would have told you that. Thanks. After reflecting the suggestion from Alan Cox to the patches, I will v2 patches to netdev. Masatake YAMATO