From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751190Ab2HLEFn (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:05:43 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:57758 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750755Ab2HLEFk (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:05:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20120811.210540.1158066885515664193.davem@davemloft.net> To: yamato@redhat.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] net: proc entry showing inodes on sockfs and their types From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1344715638-22997-1-git-send-email-yamato@redhat.com> References: <1344715638-22997-1-git-send-email-yamato@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I also want to mention that I absolutely do not consider better lsof support important at all. So if you want to add this, it had to be exactly zero overhead and it must not break anything that exists already. Your patch set violates this on both counts.