From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757116Ab2HPSbW (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:31:22 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:41484 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752662Ab2HPSbU (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:31:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:31:19 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jingoo Han Cc: "'LKML'" , "'Richard Purdie'" , "'Milo(Woogyom) Kim'" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] backlight: lp855x: remove goto err_sysfs and goto err_dev Message-Id: <20120816113119.85222ba7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <000701cd747e$9ec822f0$dc5868d0$%han@samsung.com> References: <000701cd747e$9ec822f0$dc5868d0$%han@samsung.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:25:44 +0900 Jingoo Han wrote: > This patch removes goto err_sysfs and goto err_dev, which makes code > a bit smaller. > > ... > > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c > @@ -272,29 +272,25 @@ static int lp855x_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id) > if (ret) { > dev_err(lp->dev, "i2c communication err: %d", ret); > if (mode == REGISTER_BASED) > - goto err_dev; > + return ret; > } > > ret = lp855x_backlight_register(lp); > if (ret) { > dev_err(lp->dev, > "failed to register backlight. err: %d\n", ret); > - goto err_dev; > + return ret; > } > > ret = sysfs_create_group(&lp->dev->kobj, &lp855x_attr_group); > if (ret) { > dev_err(lp->dev, "failed to register sysfs. err: %d\n", ret); > - goto err_sysfs; > + lp855x_backlight_unregister(lp); > + return ret; > } > > backlight_update_status(lp->bl); > return 0; > - > -err_sysfs: > - lp855x_backlight_unregister(lp); > -err_dev: > - return ret; > } > > static int __devexit lp855x_remove(struct i2c_client *cl) err, no. We've learned from hard experience that having multiple return points from a non-trivial function easily leads to resource leaks and missed unlocks. For this reason, kernel code frequently uses the "goto out" technique, providing a single site where deallocation and unlocking occurs.