Re: [PATCH] fork: fix oops after fork failure

[Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>]

On Thu 23-08-12 16:33:12, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 23-08-12 17:08:46, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > When we want to duplicate a new process, dup_task_struct() will undergo
> > a series of allocations. If alloc_thread_info_node() fails, we call
> > free_task_struct() and return.
> > 
> > This seems right, but it is not. free_task_struct() will not only free
> > the task struct from the kmem_cache, but will also call
> > arch_release_task_struct(). The problem is that this function is
> > supposed to undo whatever arch-specific work done by
> > arch_dup_task_struct(), that is not yet called at this point.  The
> > particular problem I ran accross was that in x86, we will arrive at
> > fpu_free() without having ever allocated it.
> > 
> > This code is very ancient, and according to git, it is there since the
> > pre-git era. But forks don't fail that often, so that made it well
> > hidden.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
> > Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> > index 152d023..b397435 100644
> > --- a/kernel/fork.c
> > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig)
> >  
> >  	ti = alloc_thread_info_node(tsk, node);
> >  	if (!ti) {
> > -		free_task_struct(tsk);
> > +		kmem_cache_free(task_struct_cachep, tsk);
> 
> What about ia64 (or !CONFIG_ARCH_THREAD_INFO_ALLOCATOR in general) which
> doesn't allocate thread_info at all?

Hit send button too fast. Should read (or CONFIG_ARCH_THREAD_INFO_ALLOCATOR)
ia64 will not fail obviously and there is no other arch which would
define own thread infor allocators but there might be some in future.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs