From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933189Ab2IFVR4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:17:56 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([193.178.161.156]:40594 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759866Ab2IFVRy (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:17:54 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 6 (does not boot on AMD64) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 23:24:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.6.0-rc3+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Andre Przywara , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Matthew Garrett , Linux PM list , Thomas Renninger References: <201209062317.53214.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209062324.15297.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: [...] > >> > >> Just wondering... Fell over it when digging into my boot-problem (this > >> appeared as a new Kconfig option, so). > >> Thanks for the explanations! > > > > Ah, OK. I got the impression that the patchset caused a problem to happen for > > you. I suppose it's fine to keep it in linux-next after all, then? > > > > Please, keep it! > My system boots with the slab-next-fixes! > My apologies for my curiosity - asking should be allowed, anyway :-). Sure, no problem with that. Thanks for the clarification. Rafael