From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
nab@linux-iscsi.org, hch@lst.de, roland@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] lots of fixes for zero allocation length
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 03:28:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120910072820.GA26052@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347031842-2531-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:30:31PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Here are the fixes for zero-length commands, that ultimately let
> all command go through normal processing, even if they have
> zero length.
>
> The first patch is for PSCSI, the others are for IBLOCK and friends.
> I tried to order them so that the safest come first. So for 3.6 you
> could choose to stop at patch 1, 2, 3 or 6, or not apply anything
> at all.
>
> Testcases included in each patch, when relevant.
Can you please submit them for the scsi testsuite?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-10 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-07 15:30 Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 01/11] target: go through normal processing for zero-length PSCSI commands Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 18:06 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 02/11] target: report too-small parameter lists everywhere Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 18:09 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 03/11] target: fail REPORT LUNS with less than 16 bytes of payload Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 18:09 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 04/11] target: support zero-size allocation lengths in transport_kmap_data_sg Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 18:12 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 05/11] target: support zero allocation length in REQUEST SENSE Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 18:17 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 06/11] target: go through normal processing for zero-length REQUEST_SENSE Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 18:23 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-07 18:33 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-07 20:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 07/11] target: support zero allocation length in INQUIRY Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 08/11] target: fix truncation of mode data, support zero allocation length Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 09/11] target: support zero allocation length in SBC commands Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 10/11] target: do not submit a zero-bio I/O request Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 11/11] target: go through normal processing for all zero-length commands Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-07 19:01 ` [PATCH 00/11] lots of fixes for zero allocation length Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-10 7:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2012-09-10 7:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120910072820.GA26052@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome