From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758745Ab2IKKqz (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:46:55 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:52493 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753451Ab2IKKqx (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:46:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:46:35 +0200 From: Thierry Reding To: Bill Huang Cc: "sameo@linux.intel.com" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "rob@landley.net" , "broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" , Laxman Dewangan , "swarren@wwwdotorg.org" , Xin Xie , "lrg@slimlogic.co.uk" , "jhovold@gmail.com" , "kyle.manna@fuel7.com" , Rhyland Klein , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: dt: add power off support for Tegra20/Tegra30 Message-ID: <20120911104635.GB28904@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> References: <1345424876-4365-1-git-send-email-bilhuang@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:lrHpN4mWGItTYgE9Xeg1cS2Eae05+SJueGoy+PDdwR3 mAvQezokMMPpRsMJc+DgIIS7LjjqrwwzH5/NnPY2N/AHLWZ6It +Qxgl/SwiKIXPllvXfcT3DNcAra5MEfKGWsQ1qubJPC6FrwzTE 98SiXF39ByVwwLoF3ARpcDEKK8EFXkUSUJD8H0mVbj0LKaNYto OBwsgGkm/SRZMILxH2K25ISLjsKQo78otxJEWWed/y+S4YS5Kg Dgwrk3XhrUG4OoD3/saaPRNadcBg4kGwawycSiwPfRXWU/HIGv H9oJnHaOWuUQqPdRCSHx2vw3YYXNpsG4UtNmd/zR1L7lDiFBlO dAHiSF+R7yKdHMjNVj41tLem/R9IAIwEjHgNKeSgV//Q6UvJtH Bv7GP4i87gZCCAXa+8F/XN7mZwsge4qnJE= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:25:14PM +0800, Bill Huang wrote: > Hi all,=20 >=20 > Could somebody review this? Given that I haven't been able to test yet (due to time constraints) with PM_SLEEP_SMP enabled, I don't want to give you a Tested-by, but the code looks okay to me, so for both patches: Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQTxaLAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhMrAP/3TFBm/FzXFsRyBM/mz16nQN dVHPyIUTpkCt5sJW9/c+WDkJFOsx0yYrIIV9GsGxXFsPMn766svA8IFmihZmYrSG ckWJovr+fEcOCOqsddAQ/GgW16WrVrshkSDPJFrlWzszvt6PdAQQkY9h+FgZXHE4 qDKFgpStkjmBahzyEG0BZrBexcvCq/X/QOfgSQpvl17rqnWdSBmxzVWEfODYveOW zkjJ/Q7SYlaO58ncuDrp0ERRePzfbgZkHZSyp62BqRbQZ5QvGAdLWaDqTnwnTvmL 4MuD1VpqCOo2hbtVfpuKM7HspVUvWwbUMFQvrhxAOaHoDkdqj8F2reCEeLF5paCI T6pZ1R6Lpuy7aRyHQI19NO2dLvAp9hDK1saHGE9S5YXRyq9qXnxso73kpaVGxacw kj8/y7avVGBO8VxUXHm4S0dSGFKFW9uMVf8Nej45C6ujPrdqPDaa8qjK8jXc4Iq6 Tw7bQNY14w6k/IVC6IR78WjvVSEO+08762C9kkube2dUy0lWXYlH0R7ffSWAHIH8 bFDHhVUhWk1jL0evIIHiLRhyu10VpRSOyMU3xlCRGt1Rpwxy7CcVHmfwAZaF39BP WFFNIHoAE9ZTdzJ8veh8X4mZWxHkCXanh03gbEK9xGmYi5Kz9vjBhSKCK63/4vfF D/hzEKEzf8Vlu5reNX4U =Bn20 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP--