From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755024Ab2ILMbn (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:31:43 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:54924 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753551Ab2ILMbm (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:31:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:36:13 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , James Bottomley , Jens Axboe , Ric Wheeler , linux-iscsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: create an all-zero filter for scanners Message-ID: <20120912133613.1255aa52@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1347449024-26387-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> References: <1347449024-26387-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1347449024-26387-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:23:43 +0200 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Using /dev/sg for scanners is blocked from unprivileged users. Reimplement > this using customizable command filters, so that the sysfs knobs will work > in this case too. > > Cc: linux-iscsi@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 6 +++++- > drivers/scsi/sg.c | 3 --- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c > index 56a9379..d168c15 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c > @@ -773,13 +773,17 @@ static int scsi_add_lun(struct scsi_device *sdev, unsigned char *inq_result, > } > > switch (sdev->type) { > + case TYPE_SCANNER: > + sdev->request_queue->cmd_filter = > + kzalloc(sizeof(struct blk_cmd_filter), GFP_KERNEL); > + /* fallthrough */ Is that really desireable in the kzalloc failing case ?