From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755267Ab2IRUlu (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:41:50 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:35356 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754216Ab2IRUlr (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:41:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:40:14 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Thierry Reding Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen , Greg Ungerer , dedekind1@gmail.com, Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, Greg Ungerer , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mike Turquette Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available Message-ID: <20120918204014.GY12245@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120910002020.GB16249@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120910003913.GM13739@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <504F4E36.20309@metafoo.de> <1347375033.27206.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <504FE633.2090304@snapgear.com> <5050F3DB.1050202@metafoo.de> <20120915213151.GM12245@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120918080037.GA15982@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> <20120918093536.GV12245@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120918112555.GA21004@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120918112555.GA21004@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:25:55PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:35:36AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:00:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:31:52PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > > > > I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at least > > > > > one driver in next which is currently broken due to the missing devm_clk_get. > > > > > Russell what's your plan for the patch? Maybe under the given circumstances it > > > > > makes sense to let it go through the m68k tree. > > > > > > > > Ok, I've merged it but there was no indication in the patch that it was > > > > supposed to be a fix... there's no cc: to stable. Does it need to go to > > > > stable? When was this brokenness introduced? What's the story for the > > > > m68k bit? I said abouve "I've merged it" - that means, I've put it in my tree... > > > What tree is this supposed to go through? I've checked your ARM tree as > > > well as Mike's clock tree but neither seem to carry this patch. The > > > reason I ask is because I want to take a patch series that converts the > > > Unicore32 PWM code to the PWM framework into linux-next but it depends > > > on this patch as well. > > > > It /is/ in my tree (you'll notice that it is in linux-next.) You're > > probably looking at my Linaro tree instead, which doesn't carry > > anything which isn't about to be sent to Linus. > > I must be blind then. next-20120918 doesn't have it. And looking at your > tree here[0] doesn't show the commit either. Hmm, it's possible I didn't push the tree out... well, I have done so now, so it should be visible from tonight onwards and should be in -next sometime during the next couple of days (it seems to take a couple of days between me pushing stuff out one evening to stuff appearing in -next because of the timezones and timing of sfr's pulls.)