From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755573Ab2IRVgG (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:36:06 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([193.178.161.156]:60723 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755138Ab2IRVgC (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:36:02 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Witold Szczeponik Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] PNP: Allow PNP resources to be disabled (interface) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:42:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.6.0-rc6+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Borislav Petkov , bhelgaas@google.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <50158321.4030007@gmx.net> <201208022340.16948.rjw@sisk.pl> <5055DFB6.6070809@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <5055DFB6.6070809@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209182342.30244.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sunday, September 16, 2012, Witold Szczeponik wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > what about the patches 1 and 3 which do not make any changes to the ABI? > The first patch simplifies the code, while the third patch fixes a problem in > the PNP resource allocation. Any chances to have them included in 3.7? They would be fine as far as I'm concerned, but I'm not maintaining that part of the kernel (at least at the moment). I'm not sure who's the maintainer of it, to be honest. Thanks, Rafael