From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>
To: Oliver Chick <oliver.chick@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Persistent grant maps for xen blk drivers
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:16:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120919131632.GS8912@reaktio.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348051887-21885-1-git-send-email-oliver.chick@citrix.com>
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:51:27AM +0100, Oliver Chick wrote:
> This patch implements persistent grants for the xen-blk{front,back}
> mechanism. The effect of this change is to reduce the number of unmap
> operations performed, since they cause a (costly) TLB shootdown. This
> allows the I/O performance to scale better when a large number of VMs
> are performing I/O.
>
> Previously, the blkfront driver was supplied a bvec[] from the request
> queue. This was granted to dom0; dom0 performed the I/O and wrote
> directly into the grant-mapped memory and unmapped it; blkfront then
> removed foreign access for that grant. The cost of unmapping scales
> badly with the number of CPUs in Dom0. An experiment showed that when
> Dom0 has 24 VCPUs, and guests are performing parallel I/O to a
> ramdisk, the IPIs from performing unmap's is a bottleneck at 5 guests
> (at which point 650,000 IOPS are being performed in total). If more
> than 5 guests are used, the performance declines. By 10 guests, only
> 400,000 IOPS are being performed.
>
> This patch improves performance by only unmapping when the connection
> between blkfront and back is broken.
>
So how many IOPS can you get with this patch / persistent grants ?
-- Pasi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-19 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-19 10:51 Oliver Chick
2012-09-19 11:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-19 12:03 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-09-20 8:51 ` Oliver Chick
2012-09-20 9:11 ` Jan Beulich
2012-09-19 13:16 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen [this message]
2012-09-20 9:35 ` Oliver Chick
2012-09-20 10:09 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-09-19 14:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-20 13:12 ` Oliver Chick
2012-09-20 13:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-20 10:34 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2012-09-20 11:30 ` Oliver Chick
2012-09-20 11:48 ` Jan Beulich
2012-09-20 13:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-20 14:13 ` Oliver Chick
2012-09-20 16:10 ` Jan Beulich
2012-09-20 21:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-21 7:18 ` Jan Beulich
2012-09-21 8:41 ` Oliver Chick
2012-09-21 9:41 ` Jan Beulich
2012-09-21 8:10 ` Ian Campbell
2012-09-21 14:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-20 15:35 ` Jan Beulich
2012-09-21 12:23 ` David Vrabel
2012-09-21 14:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-21 16:17 ` David Vrabel
2012-09-21 17:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120919131632.GS8912@reaktio.net \
--to=pasik@iki.fi \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.chick@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome