From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755259Ab2ITNae (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:30:34 -0400 Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:45002 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754586Ab2ITNac (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:30:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:30:27 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Allen Huang (=?UTF-8?B?6buD5YGJ5qC8?=) , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Michael Chen'" , "'Charles'" , "'Joseph Chang'" Subject: Re: Davicom DM9000C driver Message-ID: <20120920073027.15be4002@hpe.lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <201209200908.00519.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20120919055333.3ECF95F94D@mail.davicom.com.tw> <20120919173524.7bf4a974@lwn.net> <201209200908.00519.arnd@arndb.de> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:08:00 +0000 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > More importantly, the patch should be against the version that is > already present in the kernel as drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9000.c, > which appears to be mostly the same as the version that is submitted > here. Sigh. Leave it to me to miss the most important part of all. Ignore me, please, and listen to Arnd - good advice in general. jon