From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752400Ab2IUEvV (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:51:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:44422 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751834Ab2IUEvT (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:51:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:50:46 -0700 From: Kent Overstreet To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, neilb@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 22/26] block: Add bio_alloc_pages() Message-ID: <20120921045045.GA29160@moria.home.lan> References: <1347322957-25260-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <1347322957-25260-23-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <20120921004711.GZ7264@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120921004711.GZ7264@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:47:11PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 05:22:33PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > + bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, bio, i) { > > + bv->bv_page = alloc_page(gfp_mask); > > + if (!bv->bv_page) { > > + while (bv-- != bio->bi_io_vec) > > + __free_page(bv->bv_page); > > I don't know. I feel stupid. I think it's because the loop variable > changes between loop condition test and actual body of loop. How > about the following? It is pointing to the member of the same array > so I think it's not even violating pointer comparison rules. > > while (--bv >= bio->bi_io_vec) > __free_page(bv->bv_page); I can't remember why I did it that way, but I think I like yours better - I'll change it.