mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Deferred probing in driver model is racy, resulting in lost probes
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:08:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120926200833.GA14340@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVOZ=4HFAy38q_8ZUjOPffcv_mMTi7KCdh3HcX=MCLw5SQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:24:43PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > It isn't.  As I said, it's a race condition due to lack of locking - the
> > driver hasn't been added to the list of drivers at this point:
> >
> > int bus_add_driver(struct device_driver *drv)
> > {
> > ...
> >         if (drv->bus->p->drivers_autoprobe) {
> >                 error = driver_attach(drv);
> >                 if (error)
> >                         goto out_unregister;
> >         }
> >         klist_add_tail(&priv->knode_bus, &bus->p->klist_drivers);
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Notice that the attaching is done _before_ the driver is added to the
> > bus driver list.
> 
> Yes, it is a problem since a new device may be added to bus
> and bus_probe_device() may not see the new added driver.
> 
> So looks klist_add_tail() should complete before driver_attach()
> inside bus_add_driver().
> 
> The attached one line change should fix the problem because the
> below way can guarantee that no probe(dev) may be lost.
> 
> 
> CPU0				CPU1
> driver_register
> 	...
> 	write(bus->driver_list)
> 	smp_mb()
> 	read(bus->device_list)
> 	...
> 				device_add
> 					/* bus_add_device */	
> 					write(bus->device_list)
> 					smp_mb()
> 					/* bus_probe_device*/
> 					read(bus->driver_list)
> 
> And the smp_mb() has been implicit by UNLOCK+LOCK
> of 'klist' according to 'VARIETIES OF MEMORY BARRIER' part
> of Documentation/memory-barriers.txt.
> 
> Could you test the below patch to see if it can fix your problem?
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/bus.c b/drivers/base/bus.c
> index 181ed26..17d7437 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/bus.c
> @@ -714,12 +714,12 @@ int bus_add_driver(struct device_driver *drv)
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out_unregister;
> 
> +	klist_add_tail(&priv->knode_bus, &bus->p->klist_drivers);
>  	if (drv->bus->p->drivers_autoprobe) {
>  		error = driver_attach(drv);
>  		if (error)
>  			goto out_unregister;
>  	}
> -	klist_add_tail(&priv->knode_bus, &bus->p->klist_drivers);
>  	module_add_driver(drv->owner, drv);
> 
>  	error = driver_create_file(drv, &driver_attr_uevent);
> 
> 
> 

Did the above patch ever prove to solve the issue or not?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-26 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-18 14:58 Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-15 16:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-09-15 18:32   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-16  6:41 ` Ming Lei
2012-09-16  8:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-16 13:24     ` Ming Lei
2012-09-26 20:08       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2012-09-26 20:23         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-26 20:36           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-09-26 23:47           ` Ming Lei
2012-09-27 13:58             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-27 14:03               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-27 14:15                 ` Ming Lei
2012-09-27 17:22                 ` Joachim Eastwood
2012-09-27 17:26                   ` Mark Brown
2012-09-28  0:30                   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120926200833.GA14340@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome