From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, criu@openvz.org,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pidns: remove recursion from free_pid_ns
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:47:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121005144729.GA20497@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349385662-571743-1-git-send-email-avagin@openvz.org>
On 10/05, Andrew Vagin wrote:
>
> Here is a stack trace of recursion:
> free_pid_ns(parent)
> put_pid_ns(parent)
> kref_put(&ns->kref, free_pid_ns);
> free_pid_ns
>
> This patch turns recursion into loops.
I think the patch is correct, a couple of minor nits.
> +static inline int __kref_put(struct kref *kref)
> +{
> + return atomic_sub_and_test(1, &kref->refcount);
perhaps atomic_dec_and_test(&kref->refcount) makes more sense?
> +}
> @@ -138,11 +138,20 @@ void free_pid_ns(struct kref *kref)
>
> ns = container_of(kref, struct pid_namespace, kref);
>
> - parent = ns->parent;
> - destroy_pid_namespace(ns);
> + while (1) {
>
> - if (parent != NULL)
> - put_pid_ns(parent);
> + parent = ns->parent;
> + destroy_pid_namespace(ns);
> +
> + if (parent == NULL || parent == &init_pid_ns)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Why ns->parent == NULL is only possible if ns == init_pid_ns, right?
But in this case we should not be here. The caller verifies that
initial ns != init_pid_ns, and this loops should stop once we reach
init_pid_ns.
Oleg.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-04 21:21 Andrew Vagin
2012-10-05 6:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-10-05 14:47 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121005144729.GA20497@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=criu@openvz.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome