mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <pzijlstr@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Dan Smith <danms@us.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@gmail.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
	Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Konrad@linux.intel.com, dshaks@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] AutoNUMA27
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:34:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121008163424.335ea7ec@annuminas.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m24nm8wly3.fsf@firstfloor.org>

On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:14:44 -0700
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> IMHO needs a performance shot-out. Run both on the same 10 workloads
> and see who wins. Just a lot of of work. Any volunteers?

Here are some preliminary results from simple benchmarks on a
4-node, 32 CPU core (4x8 core) Dell PowerEdge R910 system.

For the simple linpack streams benchmark, both sched/numa and
autonuma are within the margin of error compared to manual
tuning of task affinity.  This is a big win, since the current
upstream scheduler has regressions of 10-20% when the system
runs 4 through 16 streams processes.

For specjbb, the story is more complicated. After fixing the
obvious bugs in sched/numa, and getting some basic cpu-follows-memory
code (not yet in -tip AFAIK), Larry, Peter and I, averaged results
look like this:

baseline: 	246019
manual pinning: 285481 (+16%)
autonuma:	266626 (+8%)
sched/numa:	226540 (-8%)

This is with newer sched/numa code than what is in -tip right now.
Once Peter pushes the fixes by Larry and me into -tip, as well as
his cpu-follows-memory code, others should be able to run tests
like this as well.

Now for some other workloads, and tests on 8 node systems, etc...


Full results for the specjbb run below:

BASELINE - disabling auto numa (matches RHEL6 within 1%)

[root@perf74 SPECjbb]# cat r7_36_auto27_specjbb4_noauto.txt
spec1.txt:           throughput =     243639.70 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec2.txt:           throughput =     249186.20 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec3.txt:           throughput =     247216.72 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec4.txt:           throughput =     244035.60 SPECjbb2005 bops

Manual NUMACTL results are:

[root@perf74 SPECjbb]# more r7_36_numactl_specjbb4.txt
spec1.txt:           throughput =     291430.22 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec2.txt:           throughput =     283550.85 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec3.txt:           throughput =     284028.71 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec4.txt:           throughput =     282919.37 SPECjbb2005 bops

AUTONUMA27 - 3.6.0-0.24.autonuma27.test.x86_64
[root@perf74 SPECjbb]# more r7_36_auto27_specjbb4.txt
spec1.txt:           throughput =     261835.01 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec2.txt:           throughput =     269053.06 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec3.txt:           throughput =     261230.50 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec3.txt:           throughput =     274386.81 SPECjbb2005 bops

Tuned SCHED_NUMA from Friday 10/4/2012 with fixes from Peter, Rik and 
Larry:

[root@perf74 SPECjbb]# more r7_36_schednuma_specjbb4.txt
spec1.txt:           throughput =     222349.74 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec2.txt:           throughput =     232988.59 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec3.txt:           throughput =     223386.03 SPECjbb2005 bops
spec4.txt:           throughput =     227438.11 SPECjbb2005 bops

-- 
All rights reversed.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-08 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1349308275-2174-1-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <20121004113943.be7f92a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 23:14   ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-05 23:57     ` Tim Chen
2012-10-06  0:11       ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-08 13:44         ` Don Morris
2012-10-08 20:34     ` Rik van Riel [this message]
     [not found] ` <20121011101930.GM3317@csn.ul.ie>
2012-10-11 14:56   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-11 15:35     ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-12  0:41       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-12 14:54       ` Mel Gorman
     [not found] ` <1349308275-2174-2-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20121011105036.GN3317@csn.ul.ie>
2012-10-11 16:07     ` [PATCH 01/33] autonuma: add Documentation/vm/autonuma.txt Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-11 19:37       ` Mel Gorman
     [not found] ` <1349308275-2174-5-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20121011110137.GQ3317@csn.ul.ie>
2012-10-11 16:43     ` [PATCH 04/33] autonuma: define _PAGE_NUMA Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-11 19:48       ` Mel Gorman
     [not found] ` <1349308275-2174-6-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20121011111545.GR3317@csn.ul.ie>
2012-10-11 16:58     ` [PATCH 05/33] autonuma: pte_numa() and pmd_numa() Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-11 19:54       ` Mel Gorman
     [not found] ` <1349308275-2174-7-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20121011122255.GS3317@csn.ul.ie>
2012-10-11 17:05     ` [PATCH 06/33] autonuma: teach gup_fast about pmd_numa Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-11 20:01       ` Mel Gorman
     [not found] ` <1349308275-2174-8-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20121011122827.GT3317@csn.ul.ie>
2012-10-11 17:15     ` [PATCH 07/33] autonuma: mm_autonuma and task_autonuma data structures Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-11 20:06       ` Mel Gorman
     [not found]     ` <5076E4B2.2040301@redhat.com>
     [not found]       ` <0000013a525a8739-2b4049fa-1cb3-4b8f-b3a7-1fa77b181590-000000@email.amazonses.com>
2012-10-12  0:52         ` Andrea Arcangeli
     [not found] ` <1349308275-2174-9-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20121011134643.GU3317@csn.ul.ie>
2012-10-11 17:34     ` [PATCH 08/33] autonuma: define the autonuma flags Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-11 20:17       ` Mel Gorman
     [not found] ` <1349308275-2174-11-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20121011145805.GW3317@csn.ul.ie>
2012-10-12  0:25     ` [PATCH 10/33] autonuma: CPU follows memory algorithm Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-12  8:29       ` Mel Gorman
     [not found] ` <20121011213432.GQ3317@csn.ul.ie>
2012-10-12  1:45   ` [PATCH 00/33] AutoNUMA27 Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-12  8:46     ` Mel Gorman
     [not found] ` <1349308275-2174-16-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20121011155302.GA3317@csn.ul.ie>
     [not found]     ` <50770314.7060800@redhat.com>
     [not found]       ` <20121011175953.GT1818@redhat.com>
2012-10-12 14:03         ` [PATCH 15/33] autonuma: alloc/free/init task_autonuma Rik van Riel
2012-10-13 18:40 ` [PATCH 00/33] AutoNUMA27 Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-14  4:57   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-15  8:16     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-23 16:32     ` Srikar Dronamraju
     [not found] ` <1349308275-2174-20-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20121013180618.GC31442@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-10-15  8:24     ` [PATCH 19/33] autonuma: memory follows CPU algorithm and task/mm_autonuma stats collection Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-15  9:20       ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-15 10:00         ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121008163424.335ea7ec@annuminas.surriel.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=Konrad@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=bharata.rao@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=danms@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=dshaks@redhat.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=pzijlstr@redhat.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome