From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com,
arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Add support for ST-Ericsson's u9540 SoC
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:11:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121011181108.GZ12801@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121011092039.GV9707@gmail.com>
On 10:20 Thu 11 Oct , Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>
> > On 08:38 Thu 11 Oct , Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 16:18 Wed 10 Oct , Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > First level board support for the u9540.
> > > > >
> > > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
> > > > > index 3d8e321..6b7f970 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
> > > > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > > > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/io.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/of.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
> > > > > @@ -319,6 +320,8 @@ static void __init u8500_init_machine(void)
> > > > > snowball_pinmaps_init();
> > > > > else if (of_machine_is_compatible("st-ericsson,hrefv60+"))
> > > > > hrefv60_pinmaps_init();
> > > > > + else if (of_machine_is_compatible("st-ericsson,u9540")) {}
> > > > > + /* TODO: Add u9540 pinmaps. */
> > > > do you via DT no here
> > >
> > > We don't support pinctrl yet. It will come, it's just not available yet.
> > so stop to add more and update the drviers
>
> We'll get round to it.
>
> We have a set priority list. Neither you nor I have control over that.
yes but code mainline is not driver be politics but by code review
so no do the effort to add the dt to the pinctrl it's 12 hours work so you have
no excuse to delay it again
>
> > and u9540 is a SoC name not a baord name
>
> It's both. The u9540 board is affectionately called the u9540 board.
>
> > > > > /* TODO: Export SoC, USB, cpu-freq and DMA40 */
> > > > > parent = u8500_of_init_devices();
> > > > > @@ -331,6 +334,7 @@ static const char * u8500_dt_board_compat[] = {
> > > > > "calaosystems,snowball-a9500",
> > > > > "st-ericsson,hrefv60+",
> > > > > "st-ericsson,mop500",
> > > > > + "st-ericsson,u9540",
> > > > stop to add more compatible sue a more generic one
> > >
> > > Not entirely sure what you mean here.
> > >
> > > These are the only four boards we officially support.
> > >
> > > There are other uXXXX boards that we do not.
> > you do not need it just mach a global compatbile
>
> Why? What difference does it make? I could understand if we
> had a long list of supported boards, but I think this is move
> verbose and descriptive.
this is already the case simplify it and give a good example in the mainline
code as people just do copy & paste usualy
>
> > > > > NULL,
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -345,4 +349,14 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(U8500_DT, "ST-Ericsson U8500 platform (Device Tree Support)")
> > > > > .dt_compat = u8500_dt_board_compat,
> > > > > MACHINE_END
> > > > >
> > > > > +DT_MACHINE_START(U9540_DT, "ST-Ericsson 9540 platform (Device Tree Support)")
> > > > > + .map_io = u8500_map_io,
> > > > > + .init_irq = ux500_init_irq,
> > > > > + .timer = &ux500_timer,
> > > > > + .handle_irq = gic_handle_irq,
> > > > > + .init_machine = u8500_init_machine,
> > > > > + .init_late = NULL,
> > > > > + .dt_compat = u8500_dt_board_compat,
> > > > > +MACHINE_END
> > > > really?
> > > > no need drop it for a more generic on
> > >
> > > This may look the same as the previous MACHINE_START now, but
> > > it will have differences in the future as more u9540 support is
> > > upstreamed. I think it should stick around as a separate entity
> > > for the time being. If we can consolidate the init functions at
> > > a later date, believe me I will make sure it happens.
no sorry add it when it's need not now
Best Regards,
J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-11 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-10 15:18 [PATCH 0/6] Provide basic support for the u9540 Lee Jones
2012-10-10 15:18 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused board compatible string Lee Jones
2012-10-10 15:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: ux500: Add skeleton DTS file for the u9540 Lee Jones
2012-10-10 15:18 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Add support for ST-Ericsson's u9540 SoC Lee Jones
2012-10-10 19:01 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-11 7:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-11 8:52 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-11 9:20 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-11 18:11 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2012-10-10 15:18 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Add UART support to the u9540 Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-10-10 19:03 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-11 7:29 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-11 8:50 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-11 9:22 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-11 18:06 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-12 21:15 ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-10 15:18 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable SDI4 port on the u9540 when booting with " Lee Jones
2012-10-10 19:04 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-11 7:28 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-10 15:18 ` [PATCH 6/6] mfd: Differentiate between u8500 and u9540 TCDM address mapping Lee Jones
2012-10-10 18:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-10-11 8:59 ` Lee Jones
2012-10-11 9:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121011181108.GZ12801@game.jcrosoft.org \
--to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®