mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"gong.chen@linux.intel.com" <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"ananth@in.ibm.com" <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	"masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lcm@us.ibm.com" <lcm@us.ibm.com>,
	"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
	"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/mce: Honour bios-set CMCI threshold
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:24:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121018132456.GB6951@aftab.osrc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507F96F2.9050305@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:13:14AM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> On 10/17/2012 10:58 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >BUT (squared) do you even really need to know that thresholds were set? You
> >could look at bits {52:38} in the MCi_STATUS information for the bank to see
> >how many corrected errors had been logged.
> 
> Ah, nice. I think we should be able to use this instead of the sysfs
> attribute.

Ok, patch below removes it.

@Tony: I'll send it upwards soonish in case there are no objections.
This way no stable backport will be needed.

Thanks.

--
From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:10:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86, MCE: Remove bios_cmci_threshold sysfs attribute

450cc201038f3 ("x86/mce: Provide boot argument to honour bios-set CMCI
threshold") added the bios_cmci_threshold attribute which was supposed
to communicate to userspace tools that BIOS CMCI threshold has been
honoured.

However, this info is not of any importance to userspace - rather it
can get the actual error count it has been thresholded already from
MCi_STATUS[38:52].

So drop this before it becomes a used interface (good thing is we caught
this early in 3.7-rc1, right after the merge window closed).

Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20121017105940.GA14590@x1.osrc.amd.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 29e87d3b2843..46cbf8689692 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -2209,11 +2209,6 @@ static struct dev_ext_attribute dev_attr_cmci_disabled = {
 	&mce_cmci_disabled
 };
 
-static struct dev_ext_attribute dev_attr_bios_cmci_threshold = {
-	__ATTR(bios_cmci_threshold, 0444, device_show_int, NULL),
-	&mce_bios_cmci_threshold
-};
-
 static struct device_attribute *mce_device_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_tolerant.attr,
 	&dev_attr_check_interval.attr,
@@ -2222,7 +2217,6 @@ static struct device_attribute *mce_device_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_dont_log_ce.attr,
 	&dev_attr_ignore_ce.attr,
 	&dev_attr_cmci_disabled.attr,
-	&dev_attr_bios_cmci_threshold.attr,
 	NULL
 };
 
-- 
1.8.0.rc2.4.g42e55a5

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-18 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-11  5:31 [PATCH v2] " Naveen N. Rao
2012-09-11 16:04 ` Tony Luck
2012-09-12 12:25   ` [PATCH v3] " Naveen N. Rao
2012-09-21 11:39     ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-10-17 10:59       ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-17 11:27         ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-10-17 13:09           ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-17 15:47             ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-10-17 16:40               ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-17 17:28                 ` Luck, Tony
2012-10-17 18:09                   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-18  5:43                   ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-10-18 13:24                     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-10-18 16:46                       ` Luck, Tony
2012-10-19 15:52         ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, MCE: Remove bios_cmci_threshold sysfs attribute tip-bot for Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121018132456.GB6951@aftab.osrc.amd.com \
    --to=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®