From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Cc: Sooman Jeong <77smart@hanyang.ac.kr>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Initial report on F2FS filesystem performance
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:26:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121021102638.GA14031@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E0328919-ACAA-4052-B922-952AFA375FD8@dubeyko.com>
Hi!
> >> This is a brief summary of our initial filesystem performance study of f2fs against existing two filesystems in linux: EXT4, NILFS2, and f2fs.
> >>
> >
> > Hmm, flashes are actually optimized for VFAT, right? Can you compare
> > against that?
> >
>
> Do you mean SD-cards? Because, as I can understand, "raw" flash (I mean NAND chip) hasn't any special filesystem-related optimization. Moreover, as I know, this optimization takes place in the begin of device (because FAT metadata is placed in the volume's begin). But if you have several partition on a device then you haven't any optimizations for second and next FAT partitions. So, in-place modified metadata of f2fs is placed in the begin of the volume also.
>
> Or, maybe, do you mean some another special optimization for VFAT?
>
I meant SD-card, sorry. Compare factory-formatted VFAT on SD card with
f2fs running on the same partition.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-21 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 4:07 Sooman Jeong
2012-10-16 6:58 ` Namjae Jeon
2012-10-17 4:44 ` Sooman Jeong
2012-10-20 19:22 ` Pavel Machek
2012-10-21 9:09 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2012-10-21 10:26 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2012-10-22 11:36 ` Sooman Jeong
2012-10-23 0:07 ` Pavel Machek
2012-10-23 17:10 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2012-10-30 15:36 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121021102638.GA14031@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=77smart@hanyang.ac.kr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome