mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:43:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121022114311.GQ29310@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50852F9C.9020808@siemens.com>

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 01:35:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-10-22 13:23, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 07:09:38PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >> On 10/22/2012 05:16 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 03:37:32PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >>>> After commit b3356bf0dbb349 (KVM: emulator: optimize "rep ins" handling),
> >>>> the pieces of io data can be collected and write them to the guest memory
> >>>> or MMIO together.
> >>>>
> >>>> Unfortunately, kvm splits the mmio access into 8 bytes and store them to
> >>>> vcpu->mmio_fragments. If the guest uses "rep ins" to move large data, it
> >>>> will cause vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow
> >>>>
> >>>> The bug can be exposed by isapc (-M isapc):
> >>>>
> >>>> [23154.818733] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> >>>> [ ......]
> >>>> [23154.858083] Call Trace:
> >>>> [23154.859874]  [<ffffffffa04f0e17>] kvm_get_cr8+0x1d/0x28 [kvm]
> >>>> [23154.861677]  [<ffffffffa04fa6d4>] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xcda/0xe45 [kvm]
> >>>> [23154.863604]  [<ffffffffa04f5a1a>] ? kvm_arch_vcpu_load+0x17b/0x180 [kvm]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Actually, we can use one mmio_fragment to store a large mmio access for the
> >>>> mmio access is always continuous then split it when we pass the mmio-exit-info
> >>>> to userspace. After that, we only need two entries to store mmio info for
> >>>> the cross-mmio pages access
> >>>>
> >>> I wonder can we put the data into coalesced mmio buffer instead of
> >>
> >> If we put all mmio data into coalesced buffer, we should:
> >> - ensure the userspace program uses KVM_REGISTER_COALESCED_MMIO to register
> >>   all mmio regions.
> >>
> > It appears to not be so.
> > Userspace calls kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer() after returning from
> > KVM_RUN which looks like this:
> 
> Nope, no longer, only on accesses to devices that actually use such
> regions (and there are only two ATM). The current design of a global
> coalesced mmio ring is horrible /wrt latency.
> 
Indeed. git pull, recheck and call for kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer()
is gone. So this will break new userspace, not old. By global you mean
shared between devices (or memory regions)?

--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-22 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-19  7:37 Xiao Guangrong
2012-10-19  7:39 ` [PATCH] emulator test: add "rep ins" mmio access test Xiao Guangrong
2012-11-01  0:05   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-10-22  9:16 ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 11:09   ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-10-22 11:23     ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 11:35       ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 11:43         ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2012-10-22 11:45           ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 12:18             ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 12:45               ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 12:53                 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 12:55                   ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 12:58                     ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 13:05                       ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 13:08                         ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 13:25                           ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 14:00                             ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 14:23                               ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-22 15:36                               ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 12:58                     ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 12:55                   ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 13:01                     ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 13:02                       ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 13:05                         ` Gleb Natapov
2012-10-22 12:56                 ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-22 13:58 ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121022114311.GQ29310@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome