From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] genalloc: stop crashing the system when destroying a pool
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:18:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121022141854.33f5fcf4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350820392-25815-1-git-send-email-cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:52:59 -0200
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> A gen_pool_chunk uses a bitmap to find what addresses ranges it has
> allocated and bugs when we destroy the pool and a chunk has some bits
> set.
>
> There is a problem when it allocates the bitmap. It allocates only the
> number of bytes needed for the bits that represent the size it's
> allocating. That is, if it needs 16 bits, it will allocate only 2 bytes,
> if it needs 31 bits, it will allocate 4 bytes.
>
> However, the bitops functions uses long types. And when the gen_pool_add
> allocates a bitmap, it only clears the bytes it has allocated. So, it's
> possible that we have a long word with the contents 0xffffffffffffffff,
> and only the first (most significant) bytes are cleared by memset.
> However, the destroy function is going to test for the least significant
> bits, which will not be clear as expected.
>
When fixing a bug, please do fully describe that bug. The oops trace
would be nice, but can be avoided if a suitable description is included.
Does the BUG() happen in gen_pool_destroy(), or in gen_pool_free()? In
either case, from your description it sound like the function which is
going BUG() is the site which needs fixing because it is checking for
non-zero bits outside the correct range?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-22 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-21 11:52 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2012-10-22 21:18 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-10-23 16:42 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121022141854.33f5fcf4.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@stericsson.com \
--cc=cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome