From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
To: yongd <yongd@marvell.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Wilson Callan <wilson.callan@savantsystems.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>, <zhangfei.gao@marvell.com>,
<kevin.liu@marvell.com>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] mmc: esdhc: enable polling to detect card by itself
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:20:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121031152030.GE8100@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351589403-26398-2-git-send-email-yongd@marvell.com>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 05:30:01PM +0800, yongd wrote:
> In the current code logic, sdhci_add_host() will enable the polling
> method (set MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL) for a removable card (MMC_CAP_
> NONREMOVABLE is not set) whose host's internal card detection method
> is disabled for some reason (SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION is set).
>
> However, this is improper since we can have some other card detection
> methods besides host internal card detection and polling method. For
> example, if the card detection type is ESDHC_CD_GPIO (external gpio pin
> for CD), we should keep SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION set, or host
> internal card detection interrupt will still be enabled. So, here comes
> the 1st change in this patch to keep SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION
> set for ESDHC_CD_GPIO type. But, after the 1st change, just as above
> said, sdhci_add_host() will still enable polling for such a card.This
> is redundant.
>
This actually results in an unpleasant rather than redundant behavior.
Right after this patch gets applied and before patch #3 gets applied,
driver sdhci-esdhc-imx will use polling even for ESDHC_CD_GPIO case.
> On the other hand, for the card with ESDHC_CD_NONE detection type(no CD,
> neither controller nor gpio, so use polling), we currently rely on
> sdhci_add_host() to enable polling for us.
>
> Here propose the 2nd change in this patch for such an embarrassing case.
Besides above, this is another sign that the patch (and series) should
be better partitioned.
> 1st, this patch will de-couple polling enabling with sdhci_add_host() by
> doing this in host driver itself, just as some other vendors. 2nd, one
> more patch will remove such improper MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL enabling in
> sdhci_add_host().
>
> Change-Id: Ia7525009d8fd188e3f0169f225e4a76ff9e94b47
Remove this, please.
> Signed-off-by: yongd <yongd@marvell.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index effc2ac..ff201a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static int __devinit sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "request irq error\n");
> goto no_card_detect_irq;
> }
> - /* fall through */
> + break;
The current sdhci-esdhc-imx implementation clears flag
SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION even for ESDHC_CD_GPIO case
and then emulate flag SDHCI_CARD_PRESENT by reading CD gpio state in
esdhc_readl_le(). Obviously, simply setting the flag for gpio case
does not provide an equal behavior as before.
Shawn
>
> case ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER:
> /* we have a working card_detect back */
> @@ -569,6 +569,7 @@ static int __devinit sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> break;
>
> case ESDHC_CD_NONE:
> + host->mmc->caps = MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL;
> break;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-31 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-30 9:30 [PATCH V2 0/3] mmc: remove MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL setting in sdhci_add_host yongd
2012-10-30 9:30 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] mmc: esdhc: enable polling to detect card by itself yongd
2012-10-31 15:20 ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2012-11-02 12:37 ` yongd
2012-11-05 1:54 ` Shawn Guo
2012-11-05 3:34 ` yongd
2012-11-05 12:48 ` Shawn Guo
2012-11-06 8:49 ` yongd
2012-11-06 12:52 ` Shawn Guo
2012-11-08 2:46 ` yongd
2012-10-30 9:30 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] mmc: sdhci-s3c: " yongd
2012-10-30 23:11 ` [PATCH V2 0/3] mmc: remove MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL setting in sdhci_add_host Anton Vorontsov
2012-10-31 10:07 ` yongd
2012-10-31 10:14 ` yongd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121031152030.GE8100@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net \
--to=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=dsd@laptop.org \
--cc=kevin.liu@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wilson.callan@savantsystems.com \
--cc=yongd@marvell.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®