From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] proc: add "Seccomp" to status
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:43:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121105144329.GB8292@sergelap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121101183516.GA18332@www.outflux.net>
Quoting Kees Cook (keescook@chromium.org):
> It is currently impossible to examine the state of seccomp for
> a given process. While attaching with gdb and attempting "call
> prctl(PR_GET_SECCOMP,...)" will work with some situations, it is not
> reliable. If the process is in seccomp mode 1, this query will kill the
> process (prctl not allowed), if the process is in mode 2 with prctl not
> allowed, it will similarly be killed, and in weird cases, if prctl is
> filtered to return errno 0, it can look like seccomp is disabled.
>
> When reviewing the state of running processes, there should be a way to
> externally examine the seccomp mode. ("Did this build of Chrome end up
> using seccomp?" "Did my distro ship ssh with seccomp enabled?")
>
> This adds the "Seccomp" line to /proc/$pid/status.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
One nit:
>
> ---
> v2:
> - improve commit message, add documentation, as suggested by akpm.
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 2 ++
> fs/proc/array.c | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> index a1793d6..557891d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ read the file /proc/PID/status:
> CapPrm: 0000000000000000
> CapEff: 0000000000000000
> CapBnd: ffffffffffffffff
> + Seccomp: 0
Unless my mailer has messed with it, i notice that here there are 8 spaces,
whereas the code introduces a tab. Not sure if that might confuse some
people writing simple parsers.
> voluntary_ctxt_switches: 0
> nonvoluntary_ctxt_switches: 1
>
> @@ -237,6 +238,7 @@ Table 1-2: Contents of the status files (as of 2.6.30-rc7)
> CapPrm bitmap of permitted capabilities
> CapEff bitmap of effective capabilities
> CapBnd bitmap of capabilities bounding set
> + Seccomp seccomp mode, like prctl(PR_GET_SECCOMP, ...)
> Cpus_allowed mask of CPUs on which this process may run
> Cpus_allowed_list Same as previous, but in "list format"
> Mems_allowed mask of memory nodes allowed to this process
> diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
> index c1c207c..135d6ac 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> @@ -327,6 +327,13 @@ static inline void task_cap(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *p)
> render_cap_t(m, "CapBnd:\t", &cap_bset);
> }
>
> +static inline void task_seccomp(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
> + seq_printf(m, "Seccomp:\t%d\n", p->seccomp.mode);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> static inline void task_context_switch_counts(struct seq_file *m,
> struct task_struct *p)
> {
> @@ -360,6 +367,7 @@ int proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> }
> task_sig(m, task);
> task_cap(m, task);
> + task_seccomp(m, task);
> task_cpus_allowed(m, task);
> cpuset_task_status_allowed(m, task);
> task_context_switch_counts(m, task);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Chrome OS Security
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-05 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-01 18:35 Kees Cook
2012-11-03 11:51 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2012-11-03 16:07 ` Kees Cook
2012-11-05 14:43 ` Serge Hallyn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121105144329.GB8292@sergelap \
--to=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®