From: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
To: Christof Meerwald <cmeerw@cmeerw.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Holland <pholland@adobe.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] epoll: replace EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE with EPOLL_CTL_POKE
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:58:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121106215854.GA6626@dcvr.yhbt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121103011031.GA22452@edge.cmeerw.net>
Christof Meerwald <cmeerw@cmeerw.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 04:13:12 +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> [...]
> > EPOLL_CTL_POKE may be used to force an item into the epoll
> > ready list. Instead of disabling an item asynchronously
> > via EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE, this forces the threads calling
> > epoll_wait() to handle the item in its normal loop.
>
> That was my initial suggestion as well - see
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/19/358
Thanks, missed that the first time around. Perhaps TRIGGER is a
better name than POKE :x
I'm hoping Paton has a chance to look at my implementation and
comment on it.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-06 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-26 0:08 [PATCH v3] epoll: Support for disabling items, and a self-test app Paton J. Lewis
2012-10-29 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-31 6:32 ` Michael Wang
2012-10-31 18:57 ` Paton J. Lewis
2012-11-01 0:43 ` Michael Wang
2012-11-01 18:47 ` Paton J. Lewis
2012-11-02 2:26 ` Michael Wang
2012-11-02 4:13 ` [RFC/PATCH] epoll: replace EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE with EPOLL_CTL_POKE Eric Wong
2012-11-03 1:10 ` Christof Meerwald
2012-11-06 21:58 ` Eric Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121106215854.GA6626@dcvr.yhbt.net \
--to=normalperson@yhbt.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmeerw@cmeerw.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pholland@adobe.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome