From: Kent Yoder <key@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Cc: Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@selhorst.net>,
Sirrix AG <tpmdd@sirrix.com>,
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] char/tpm: simplify duration calculation and eliminate sparse warning.
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:18:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121114221826.GC533@ennui.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352759838-27175-2-git-send-email-peterhuewe@gmx.de>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:37:18PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
> This patch changes the semantics of the duration calculation for an
> ordinal, by masking out the higher bits of a tpm command, which specify
> whether it's an TPM_PROTECTED_COMMAND, TPM_UNPROTECTED_COMMAND,
> TPM_CONNECTION_COMMAND, TPM_CONNECTION_COMMAND, TPM_VENDOR_COMMAND.
> (See TPM Main Spec Part 2 Section 17 for details).
>
> For all TPM_PROTECTED and TPM_CONNECTION commands the results are
> unchanged.
> The TPM_UNPROTECTED commands are TSS commands and thus irrelevant as
> they are not sent to the tpm.
> For vendor commands the semantics change for ordinals 10 and 11 but
> they were probably wrong anyway.
>
> For everything else which has the ordinal set to 10 or 11 the semantics
> change as it now uses TPM_UNDEFINED instead of TPM_SHORT which was
> probably wrong anyway (but irrelevant as not defined by the standard).
>
> This patch also gets rid of the (false positive) sparse warning:
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c:360 tpm_calc_ordinal_duration() error: buffer
> overflow 'tpm_protected_ordinal_duration' 12 <= 243
I'm not seeing this sparse warning, how did you get it?
Thanks,
Kent
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> index 9e3c529..a455d11 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> @@ -40,8 +40,9 @@ enum tpm_duration {
> };
>
> #define TPM_MAX_ORDINAL 243
> -#define TPM_MAX_PROTECTED_ORDINAL 12
> -#define TPM_PROTECTED_ORDINAL_MASK 0xFF
> +#define TCS_MAX_ORDINAL 12
> +#define TPM_PROTECTED_COMMAND 0x00
> +#define TPM_CONNECTION_COMMAND 0x40
>
> /*
> * Bug workaround - some TPM's don't flush the most
> @@ -336,13 +337,11 @@ unsigned long tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> {
> int duration_idx = TPM_UNDEFINED;
> int duration = 0;
> + u8 category = (ordinal >> 24) & 0xFF;
>
> - if (ordinal < TPM_MAX_ORDINAL)
> + if ((category == TPM_PROTECTED_COMMAND && ordinal < TPM_MAX_ORDINAL) ||
> + (category == TPM_CONNECTION_COMMAND && ordinal < TCS_MAX_ORDINAL))
> duration_idx = tpm_ordinal_duration[ordinal];
> - else if ((ordinal & TPM_PROTECTED_ORDINAL_MASK) <
> - TPM_MAX_PROTECTED_ORDINAL)
> - duration_idx =
> - tpm_ordinal_duration[ordinal & TPM_PROTECTED_ORDINAL_MASK];
>
> if (duration_idx != TPM_UNDEFINED)
> duration = chip->vendor.duration[duration_idx];
> --
> 1.7.8.6
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-12 22:37 [PATCH 1/2] char/tpm: Remove duplicated lookup table Peter Huewe
2012-11-12 22:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] char/tpm: simplify duration calculation and eliminate sparse warning Peter Huewe
2012-11-14 22:18 ` Kent Yoder [this message]
2012-11-14 22:37 ` Peter Hüwe
2012-11-15 16:42 ` Kent Yoder
[not found] ` <fa7287de-06dd-40b4-9d9a-56fcc8a5f670@email.android.com>
2012-11-15 21:53 ` Kent Yoder
2012-11-15 23:31 ` [PATCH v2] char/tpm: simplify duration calculation and eliminate smatch warning Peter Huewe
2012-11-16 17:33 ` Kent Yoder
2012-11-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] char/tpm: Remove duplicated lookup table Kent Yoder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121114221826.GC533@ennui.austin.ibm.com \
--to=key@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \
--cc=tpmdd@sirrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome