mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	jonas.aberg@stericsson.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Boottime: measure bootloader and kernel bootup time
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:15:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121115101508.GB4398@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352973847-21605-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>

On 10:04 Thu 15 Nov     , Lee Jones wrote:
> This patchset supplies a new tool which measures boottime inclusive
> of bootloader involvement. It seems to be accurate and adds no
> latency to the booting of the system.
> 
> In the first round of testing we booted the kernel 3 times each with
> boottime enabled and disabled. Actually, when it was disabled, the
> code was completely removed from the kernel source and the kernel was
> rebuilt. The difference between present & enabled and completely
> removed was very little indeed. In fact, averaging out the 3 runs of
> each, when boottime was enabled the system booted 4ms _faster_, go
> figure!
> 
>              Enabled    Disabled
>   1st run    2.983093   2.985168
>   2nd run    2.973266   2.971801
>   3rd run    2.975402   2.987304
>   Average    2.977254   2.981424   -0.004171 (-4ms)
> 
> 
> For the next round of testing, we delayed the bootloader for varying
> amounts of time, then started to remove key components from kernel
> functionality to see if the boottime system would pick-up on them.
> 
>   /* Hang around in the bootloader for a while. */
>   $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/boottime/summary 
>     kernel: 42864 msecs
>     total: 42864 msecs
>     kernel: cpu0 system: 56% idle: 43% iowait: 0% irq: 0% 
>             cpu1 system: 4% idle: 95% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> 
>   /* Hang around in the bootloader for a smaller amount of time. */
>     kernel: 12351 msecs
>     total: 12351 msecs
>     kernel: cpu0 system: 56% idle: 43% iowait: 0% irq: 0% 
>             cpu1 system: 2% idle: 97% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
>   
>   /* Instant boot. (1st run) */
>     kernel: 7833 msecs
>     total: 7833 msecs
>     kernel: cpu0 system: 55% idle: 44% iowait: 0% irq: 0% 
>             cpu1 system: 3% idle: 96% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> 
>   /* Instant boot. (2nd run) */
>     kernel: 7817 msecs
>     total: 7817 msecs
>     kernel: cpu0 system: 53% idle: 46% iowait: 0% irq: 0% 
>             cpu1 system: 8% idle: 91% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
> 
>   /* Instant boot. (3rd run) */
>     kernel: 7747 msecs
>     total: 7747 msecs
>     kernel: cpu0 system: 56% idle: 42% iowait: 0% irq: 0% 
>             cpu1 system: 2% idle: 97% iowait: 0% irq: 0%
7/8s? on a u9500 wow it's really slow

I do 2/3s here

Best Regards.
J.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-15 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15 10:04 Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] Boottime: A tool for automatic measurement of kernel/bootloader boot time Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:16   ` Kyungmin Park
2012-11-15 11:25     ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 12:25       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 17:31         ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-20 16:16       ` Lee Jones
2012-11-29 20:35         ` Simon Glass
2012-11-30  8:21           ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 13:52   ` Andrew Murray
2012-11-15 14:37     ` Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] clocksource: clksrc-dbx500-prcmu: Add boottime support Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:15 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2012-11-15 10:35   ` [PATCH 0/2] Boottime: measure bootloader and kernel bootup time Lee Jones
2012-11-15 10:57     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121115101508.GB4398@game.jcrosoft.org \
    --to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jonas.aberg@stericsson.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®