From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757900Ab2KWITl (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Nov 2012 03:19:41 -0500 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:36390 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754013Ab2KWITk (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Nov 2012 03:19:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 03:19:39 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dave Kleikamp Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zach Brown , "Maxim V. Patlasov" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/31] dio: create a dio_aligned() helper function Message-ID: <20121123081938.GB10731@infradead.org> References: <1353537671-26284-1-git-send-email-dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> <1353537671-26284-10-git-send-email-dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1353537671-26284-10-git-send-email-dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 04:40:49PM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > From: Zach Brown > > __blockdev_direct_IO() had two instances of the same code to determine > if a given offset wasn't aligned first to the inode's blkbits and then > to the underlying device's blkbits. This was confusing enough but > we're about to add code that performs the same check on offsets in bvec > arrays. Rather than add yet more copies of this code let's have > everyone call a helper. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp > Cc: Zach Brown > --- > fs/direct-io.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c > index f86c720..035c0a3 100644 > --- a/fs/direct-io.c > +++ b/fs/direct-io.c > @@ -1020,6 +1020,39 @@ static inline int drop_refcount(struct dio *dio) > } > > /* > + * Returns true if the given offset is aligned to either the IO size > + * specified by the given blkbits or by the logical block size of the > + * given block device. > + * > + * If the given offset isn't aligned to the blkbits arguments as this is > + * called then blkbits is set to the block size of the specified block > + * device. The call can then return either true or false. > + * > + * This bizarre calling convention matches the code paths that > + * duplicated the functionality that this helper was built from. We > + * reproduce the behaviour to avoid introducing subtle bugs. > + */ > +static int dio_aligned(unsigned long offset, unsigned *blkbits, > + struct block_device *bdev) > +{ > + unsigned mask = (1 << *blkbits) - 1; > + > + /* > + * Avoid references to bdev if not absolutely needed to give > + * the early prefetch in the caller enough time. > + */ > + > + if (offset & mask) { > + if (bdev) > + *blkbits = blksize_bits(bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)); I don't like having the blkbits assignment hidden in the helper, shouldn't we have a: if (bdev) blkbits = blksize_bits(bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)); else blkbits = inode->i_blkbits; in the caller instead?