mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitalii Demianets <vitas@nppfactor.kiev.ua>
To: Tux9 <tuxding@gmail.com>
Cc: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uio.c: Fix warning: 'ret' might be used uninitialized
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:36:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201211291836.59358.vitas@nppfactor.kiev.ua> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201211291822.16565.vitas@nppfactor.kiev.ua>

> On Thursday 29 November 2012 18:05:27 Tux9 wrote:
> > Hans, I think there are something wrong in your patch, while Vitalii's
> > is right. The variable "ret" is reused in line 292 and line 295, so
> > the value of "ret" would be overridden (if it goto err_map in line 284
> > when mi>=1).
>
> Actually, both patches do exactly the same thing. Hans's patch establishes
> default value for the ret for all those "other" cases when ret is not
> explicitly overridden. My patch explicitly enumerates all those "other"
> cases in more wordily manner.
>

Oops, disregard this. After looking at it more thoroughly I got your point.
You are right, ret is overridden at first iteration (mi == 0), so Hans's 
approach does not work.
I must do more thinking before replying in a hurry.

> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Hans J. Koch <hjk@hansjkoch.de> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:58:32AM +0200, Vitalii Demianets wrote:
> > >> On Wednesday 28 November 2012 00:43:41 Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > >> > Thanks, good catch, but why don't you simply do this:
> > >>
> > >> Just a matter of personal preference.
> > >
> > > Your patch: 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > My patch: 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Both achieve exactly the same. That's not a matter of personal
> > > preference, that's the difference between a working solution and
> > > a good solution. In the kernel, we want the latter.
> > >
> > >> As a maintainer you can apply either
> > >> patch you want. I guess you would prefer your approach and I have no
> > >> objections to that :)
> > >
> > > That's not the right kind of comment. Don't make it a habit.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Hans
> > >
> > >> > >From 228445996bb75a44d16b6237eca6a0916d9b2d7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > >> > > 2001
> > >> >
> > >> > From: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de>
> > >> > Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 23:38:00 +0100
> > >> > Subject: [PATCH] uio: Fix warning: 'ret' might be used uninitialized
> > >> >
> > >> > In two cases, the return value variable "ret" can be undefined.
> > >> >
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Hans J. Koch <hjk@hansjkoch.de>
> > >> > ---
> > >> >  drivers/uio/uio.c |    2 +-
> > >> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >> >
> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio.c b/drivers/uio/uio.c
> > >> > index 5110f36..fc60e35 100644
> > >> > --- a/drivers/uio/uio.c
> > >> > +++ b/drivers/uio/uio.c
> > >> > @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static struct class uio_class = {
> > >> >   */
> > >> >  static int uio_dev_add_attributes(struct uio_device *idev)
> > >> >  {
> > >> > -   int ret;
> > >> > +   int ret = -ENOMEM;
> > >> >     int mi, pi;
> > >> >     int map_found = 0;
> > >> >     int portio_found = 0;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-29 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-27 11:48 Vitalii Demianets
2012-11-27 12:24 ` Vitalii Demianets
2012-11-27 22:43 ` Hans J. Koch
2012-11-28  8:58   ` Vitalii Demianets
2012-11-28 21:05     ` Hans J. Koch
2012-11-29 16:05       ` Tux9
2012-11-29 16:22         ` Vitalii Demianets
2012-11-29 16:33           ` Cong Ding
2012-11-29 16:36           ` Vitalii Demianets [this message]
2012-11-29 23:58             ` Hans J. Koch
2012-11-30 11:12               ` Tux9
2012-11-30 21:33                 ` Hans J. Koch
2012-12-01  1:22                   ` Cong Ding
2012-12-01  3:56                     ` Hans J. Koch
2012-12-01  9:58                       ` Cong Ding
2012-12-03  7:51                         ` Hans J. Koch
2012-11-30 11:16               ` Vitalii Demianets
2012-11-30 21:39                 ` Hans J. Koch
2012-11-30 23:43                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-12-03  7:41                     ` [PATCH] stable: uio: " Hans J. Koch
2012-12-03 13:38                       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-12-03  8:35                   ` [PATCH] uio.c: " Vitalii Demianets
2012-12-03  8:53                     ` Vitalii Demianets
2012-12-03 17:27                       ` Hans J. Koch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201211291836.59358.vitas@nppfactor.kiev.ua \
    --to=vitas@nppfactor.kiev.ua \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hjk@hansjkoch.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tuxding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®