From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755761Ab2K3L56 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2012 06:57:58 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42922 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755386Ab2K3L5v (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2012 06:57:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:56:57 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Namhyung Kim Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Corey Ashford , Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] perf tool: Centralize default columns init in perf_hpp__init Message-ID: <20121130115657.GB1080@krava.brq.redhat.com> References: <1354110769-2998-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1354110769-2998-11-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <87ehjcoc70.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <20121129121319.GD1096@krava.brq.redhat.com> <87624nof10.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87624nof10.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:06:51PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:13:19 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:55:47PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > >> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:52:45 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > >> > Now when diff command is separated from other standard outputs, > >> > we can use perf_hpp__init to initialize all standard columns. > >> > > >> > Moving PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD column init back to perf_hpp__init, > >> > and removing extra enable calls. > >> > >> Why was this needed in the first place? AFAIK it's already there and > >> didn't used only for perf diff. > > > > hm, I think PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD wasn't part of perf_hpp__init and every > > report except for diff command is using it.. so I think it makes sense > > to move it to perf_hpp__init.. maybe I'm missing something. > > You're right. The _OVERHEAD column was enabled by default but wasn't > part of the _init function - sorry for the confusion. But what I try to > say was that it can be folded into the patch 1. hm, probably yes.. I'll check thanks, jirka