From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753286Ab2LATN2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2012 14:13:28 -0500 Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:53809 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752898Ab2LATN1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2012 14:13:27 -0500 Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 11:13:21 -0800 From: Tejun Heo To: Zlatko Calusic Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: High context switch rate, ksoftirqd's chewing cpu Message-ID: <20121201191321.GC2685@htj.dyndns.org> References: <50A78AA9.5040904@iskon.hr> <20121130225200.GB6021@htj.dyndns.org> <20121130225545.GC6021@htj.dyndns.org> <50B9E4C1.2050002@iskon.hr> <20121201143852.GA2685@htj.dyndns.org> <50BA3A2E.9020303@iskon.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50BA3A2E.9020303@iskon.hr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 06:11:10PM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > Sure. Please clarify, should I apply it on top of the previous one > or standalone? It's a replacement, so by itself. Thanks! -- tejun