From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: sbw@mit.edu, tj@kernel.org, amit.kucheria@linaro.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/10] smp, cpu hotplug: Fix smp_call_function_*() to prevent CPU offline properly
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:24:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121204085419.25919.79543.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121204085149.25919.29920.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
With stop_machine() gone from the CPU offline path, we can't depend on
preempt_disable() to prevent CPUs from going offline from under us.
Use the get/put_online_cpus_stable_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going
offline, while invoking from atomic context.
[ Michael: Designed the synchronization for the IPI case ]
Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ Srivatsa: Generalized it to work for all cases and wrote the changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/smp.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 29dd40a..581727c 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
* prevent preemption and reschedule on another processor,
* as well as CPU removal
*/
- this_cpu = get_cpu();
+ get_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
+ this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
/*
* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
@@ -326,7 +327,7 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
func(info);
local_irq_restore(flags);
} else {
- if ((unsigned)cpu < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(cpu)) {
+ if ((unsigned)cpu < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online_stable(cpu)) {
struct call_single_data *data = &d;
if (!wait)
@@ -342,7 +343,7 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
}
}
- put_cpu();
+ put_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
return err;
}
@@ -371,8 +372,10 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
const struct cpumask *nodemask;
int ret;
+ get_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
/* Try for same CPU (cheapest) */
- cpu = get_cpu();
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
goto call;
@@ -380,15 +383,15 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
nodemask = cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(cpu));
for (cpu = cpumask_first_and(nodemask, mask); cpu < nr_cpu_ids;
cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, nodemask, mask)) {
- if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ if (cpu_online_stable(cpu))
goto call;
}
/* Any online will do: smp_call_function_single handles nr_cpu_ids. */
- cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask, cpu_online_stable_mask);
call:
ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
- put_cpu();
+ put_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_any);
@@ -409,14 +412,17 @@ void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data,
unsigned int this_cpu;
unsigned long flags;
- this_cpu = get_cpu();
+ get_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
+
+ this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
/*
* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
* We allow cpu's that are not yet online though, as no one else can
* send smp call function interrupt to this cpu and as such deadlocks
* can't happen.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) && wait && irqs_disabled()
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(this_cpu) && wait && irqs_disabled()
&& !oops_in_progress);
if (cpu == this_cpu) {
@@ -427,7 +433,7 @@ void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data,
csd_lock(data);
generic_exec_single(cpu, data, wait);
}
- put_cpu();
+ put_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
}
/**
@@ -451,6 +457,8 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
unsigned long flags;
int refs, cpu, next_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ get_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
+
/*
* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
* We allow cpu's that are not yet online though, as no one else can
@@ -461,23 +469,24 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
&& !oops_in_progress && !early_boot_irqs_disabled);
/* Try to fastpath. So, what's a CPU they want? Ignoring this one. */
- cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_stable_mask);
if (cpu == this_cpu)
- cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_stable_mask);
/* No online cpus? We're done. */
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
- return;
+ goto out_unlock;
/* Do we have another CPU which isn't us? */
- next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
+ next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_stable_mask);
if (next_cpu == this_cpu)
- next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(next_cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
+ next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(next_cpu, mask,
+ cpu_online_stable_mask);
/* Fastpath: do that cpu by itself. */
if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
- return;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
data = &__get_cpu_var(cfd_data);
@@ -516,14 +525,14 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
smp_wmb();
/* We rely on the "and" being processed before the store */
- cpumask_and(data->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpumask_and(data->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_stable_mask);
cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, data->cpumask);
refs = cpumask_weight(data->cpumask);
/* Some callers race with other cpus changing the passed mask */
if (unlikely(!refs)) {
csd_unlock(&data->csd);
- return;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&call_function.lock, flags);
@@ -554,6 +563,9 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
/* Optionally wait for the CPUs to complete */
if (wait)
csd_lock_wait(&data->csd);
+
+out_unlock:
+ put_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_many);
@@ -574,9 +586,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_many);
*/
int smp_call_function(smp_call_func_t func, void *info, int wait)
{
- preempt_disable();
- smp_call_function_many(cpu_online_mask, func, info, wait);
- preempt_enable();
+ get_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
+ smp_call_function_many(cpu_online_stable_mask, func, info, wait);
+ put_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 8:53 [RFC PATCH 00/10] CPU hotplug: stop_machine()-free CPU hotplug Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] CPU hotplug: Introduce "stable" cpu online mask, for atomic hotplug readers Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 15:17 ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-04 21:14 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-05 2:56 ` Michael Wang
2012-12-05 3:28 ` Michael Wang
2012-12-05 12:38 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 8:54 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-12-04 22:17 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] smp, cpu hotplug: Fix smp_call_function_*() to prevent CPU offline properly Andrew Morton
2012-12-05 12:41 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 23:39 ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-05 12:44 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 8:54 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] smp, cpu hotplug: Fix on_each_cpu_*() " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 8:54 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] sched, cpu hotplug: Use stable online cpus in try_to_wake_up() & select_task_rq() Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 8:55 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] kick_process(), cpu-hotplug: Prevent offlining of target CPU properly Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 8:55 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] yield_to(), cpu-hotplug: Prevent offlining of other CPUs properly Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 8:55 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] KVM: VMX: fix invalid cpu passed to smp_call_function_single Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 8:55 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] KVM: VMX: fix memory order between loading vmcs and clearing vmcs Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 8:56 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] KVM: VMX: fix unsyc vmcs status when cpu is going down Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-12-04 8:56 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] cpu: No more __stop_machine() in _cpu_down() Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121204085419.25919.79543.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®