From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752886Ab2LEVgI (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:36:08 -0500 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:54039 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751980Ab2LEVgF (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:36:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 21:41:14 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , Andreas Mohr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Shaohua , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Look Ma, da kernel is b0rken Message-ID: <20121205214114.0bb545f1@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20121205211244.GA6239@liondog.tnic> References: <20121205070901.GA12123@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> <20121205142935.GA12119@liondog.tnic> <20121205152756.5afec12c@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <20121205153121.GA28556@liondog.tnic> <20121205154749.2af4ef36@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <20121206075721.18c0c05aa767b330f47d77eb@canb.auug.org.au> <20121205211244.GA6239@liondog.tnic> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:12:45 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 07:57:21AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:47:49 +0000 Alan Cox wrote: > > > And yes btw we should turn this option on in -next, and get these sort of > > > things out of the tree for good. More importantly it'll mean anyone > > > adding another one gets a whine on the spot. > > > > While I appreciate your confidence, I don't notice quite a few new > > warnings (because there are so many of them already :-(). Is there some > > reason to not turn this on in our "normal" builds? Does it produce many > > false positives? > > Yes, it produces a huge number of warnings which need weeding out (some > of them are false positives and some of them are simply unfixable due to > design decisions in the kernel, etc, etc): > > $ make W=123 drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.o 2> w.log I was just talking about the always true/always false stuff !