From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752028Ab2LJUYH (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:24:07 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:59540 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751395Ab2LJUYG (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:24:06 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:23:56 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20121210.152356.1449949752496567529.davem@davemloft.net> To: jwerner@chromium.org Cc: davej@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, jmorris@namei.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, snanda@chromium.org, msb@chromium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Avoid infinite loop on recvmsg bug From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <1352431796.19779.536.camel@edumazet-glaptop> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've tossed these two patches under the carpet, so you'll need to repost whichever one you want me to consider. Basically, discussing old patches is pretty useless without a resend to get it back into the fore-front of the patchwork queue. So please don't reference old stale patches without an associated repost like this. Thanks.