From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752201Ab2LJWwZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:52:25 -0500 Received: from mail-1-out2.atlantis.sk ([80.94.52.71]:42674 "EHLO mail.atlantis.sk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751310Ab2LJWwY (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:52:24 -0500 From: Ondrej Zary To: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Enable A20 using KBC for some MSI laptops to fix S3 resume Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:51:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748) Cc: Alan Cox , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <201210261056.44225.zary@gsystems.sk> <201211052135.20009.linux@rainbow-software.org> <50C6537A.9090303@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <50C6537A.9090303@zytor.com> X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201212102351.41144.linux@rainbow-software.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 10 December 2012 22:26:18 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 11/05/2012 12:35 PM, Ondrej Zary wrote: > > On Friday 26 October 2012 10:56:44 Ondrej Zary wrote: > >> Some MSI laptop BIOSes are broken - INT 15h code uses port 92h to enable > >> A20 line but resume code assumes that KBC was used. > >> The laptop will not resume from S3 otherwise but powers off after a > >> while and then powers on again stuck with a blank screen. > >> > >> Fix it by enabling A20 using KBC. Affected laptop list and DMI data are > >> from bug reports at Ubuntu Launchpad. > >> > >> Also add kernel parameter to easily activate this quirk on any system. > >> > >> Only compile tested. The original patch was tested with EX600 and PR200. > >> > >> Fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878 > > > > The bug was marked as RESOLVED CODE_FIX but I wonder what happened to > > this patch. Was it applied? Or is someone working on a better way to fix > > this problem? > > Sorry, I managed to forget about this. > > Is there any way you could test this patch by any chance? > > I would be a lot happier if this works as a general solution rather than > relying on a quirk... I have a PR200 laptop for a while now so I'll try to test this patch. -- Ondrej Zary