From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752514Ab2LKJsa (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:48:30 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:51698 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751256Ab2LKJs1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:48:27 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:48:12 +0100 From: Thierry Reding To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Grant Likely , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] leds: leds-pwm: Convert to use devm_get_pwm Message-ID: <20121211094812.GA22222@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> References: <1355133637-2784-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <3193669.Hv54bBklsP@barack> <20121211083632.GC27084@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> <1406670.ryvqfkiNXS@barack> <20121211093100.GA8437@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> <50C6FF69.3030001@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50C6FF69.3030001@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:A3KfJJz+ocSijxvDKiSRbWv+RL1AQq9zRpkq+vTZjV6 BAQqret4m203dx9DodyC4jdr+/0NeFVVy98SjBdJYbAJyf3i3I 8e9z+gjxAsn/VQQxqgEW+rVpBSVVg6ZB2snjGMdxyXnfWwlCzE auxOrNpNdlqfZHEumR9PycjnN/3baMuLAhcygQjGXdjVJtIcSM bak0P+QIzHbXW2HX2c5coRVth+ijYzbW+p5YR4fK7lKRxVUIoi EJLkBzXDhFkP2QFSRe0Qnc4RKdf7wiIkgKXWpN/5E326TfQg/U 5Y9sDHbzxFTo88lX3qZd+UOUyW2b6Ceb17gBovurzEjBzaHlPh NB0t3EPr+H9HNy9TyuSwEib3h0VEJv5mXgatxBdyZz560sP3po ieBExzRMawVkjzWr0CYLfnbnNa/b93Lx/k= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:39:53AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > On 12/11/2012 10:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:57:51AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > Okay, if there are no intree users that may be broken, then it should be > > fine to remove it. In that case you might want to remove the pwm_id > > field as well instead of deprecating it in this patch. >=20 > The reason I marked the pwm_id as deprecated is to signal to out of tree = users > (if any) that they should stop using it since it is going to go away in t= he > next cycle. > If we remove it right away the sdp4030 board file will not going to compi= le in > subsystem trees, only in linux-next. Okay, go ahead then. As long as the field will be removed eventually that's fine with me. Thierry --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQxwFcAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhJUUP/0efndKIXn3fk1TL8UxRlCG9 ISfxJ53VOLaCuVxK92Cwg9dYlmGVk3CGLdr4919Z+QVI0JzuNSjS5hiYAX4SRSyA Y3cg+Jk+SCOy35EDpi7JJzcD2of54Tgo01O818fKnS9yS3vt5VZqzIZZhEfQm5Kk OB8sJOV5KIphjxA/0knsqqRpELHyWmPPFYoW1OCxZO1/MkNPBkx+VnVNN/u3SyHQ J+nEyWF03jzC2fY4Vi0CKKuYOtghSvKTA99hsQzACy10PcdTUpv0VPKXgexZ2YCO vWlBEyNPWqiLKLag4cBSPfGh3b759g/Naw9npgO+hGe4BRIjQ/jGFYSv0mph7sdw 9KUuWA+iTGZajQhI1npqRnHnGPp/ir3rJs2cmQNEuZoXzYWK3pfxwaFLHQOSqDDU PTmS7gqwfuXxTBvdXSLfmjC+8aKZyowGzRajzL1Chwejj1I9kgK9jgg1oAOHDbfU XMlV7W+G0hiiaHfKgC4N0p1jRYqj3WAjzvwHKYEEztTZ7WWvUAg+49yZiGCKxR1S KWQ7v17Adcg37veKo8QFn9PaJqBbeE5z1w7fdF4Cvier8meljhujRL0wv3spzZdJ RTA4A38Q7qpiHaxrZbqVKIlWzcJVM8eRnNZ78BwXqPMfNqdYgOpmsO9ZnzRNGoFh UqMQjI6UWKvQcc2vJatZ =lTqb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--