From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754174Ab2LKRLo (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:11:44 -0500 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:60865 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753414Ab2LKRLn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:11:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:16:10 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Andrew Lunn , Yehuda Yitschak , Maen Suleiman , Jason Cooper , Tawfik Bayouk , Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes , Eran Ben-Avi , Nadav Haklai , Paul Gortmaker , Lior Amsalem , Shadi Ammouri , Gregory Clement , Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [RFC v1 01/16] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT Message-ID: <20121211171610.01c2de16@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20121211162647.GS14363@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1354917879-32073-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1354917879-32073-2-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <201212111043.50627.arnd@arndb.de> <20121211162647.GS14363@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Correct. If HAS_IOPORT is not selected then we are potentially missing > the dependent functions (because the platform has no IOPORT support) _or_ > it does have ISA/PCI IO spaces _but_ they're not mappable via the > ioport_map() mechanism due to some non-linearity involved in the > translation. > > To make that second point clear, that's platforms where: > > ioport_map(addr + 4) != ioport_map(addr) + 4. For inb/inw and friends this shouldn't matter. You can implement inl for example as if (unlikely(addr & 3)) // or in fact BUG on this for almost all h/w uninlined_hard_slow_inl(addr); else return *(u32 *)iospace_map[addr];