From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Andriy Skulysh <andriy_skulysh@xyratex.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sunrpc: Fix lockd sleeping until timeout
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:53:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130104005345.GA4407@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADug+U6-=+_Xy41Lw3hnOqSR84Bo7MjKDL_PykiZVdUx=b8tAA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 05:09:07PM +0200, Andriy Skulysh wrote:
> There is a race in enqueueing thread to a pool and
> waking up a thread.
> lockd doesn't wake up on reception of lock granted callback
> if svc_wake_up() is called before lockd's thread is added
> to a pool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andriy Skulysh <Andriy_Skulysh@xyratex.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 1 +
> net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> index 676ddf5..1f0216b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct svc_pool {
> unsigned int sp_nrthreads; /* # of threads in pool */
> struct list_head sp_all_threads; /* all server threads */
> struct svc_pool_stats sp_stats; /* statistics on pool operation */
> + int sp_task_pending;/* has pending task */
> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> /*
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> index b8e47fa..c7ab6f5 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> @@ -499,7 +499,8 @@ void svc_wake_up(struct svc_serv *serv)
> rqstp->rq_xprt = NULL;
> */
> wake_up(&rqstp->rq_wait);
> - }
> + } else
> + pool->sp_task_pending = 1;
> spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
> }
> }
> @@ -634,7 +635,13 @@ struct svc_xprt *svc_get_next_xprt(struct
> svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
> * long for cache updates.
> */
> rqstp->rq_chandle.thread_wait = 1*HZ;
> + pool->sp_task_pending = 0;
> } else {
> + if (pool->sp_task_pending) {
> + pool->sp_task_pending = 0;
> + spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
> + return -EAGAIN;
That should be ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN).
Other than this this looks right to me....
Out of curiosity: how did you run across this problem, and how did you
test the fix?
--b.
> + }
> /* No data pending. Go to sleep */
> svc_thread_enqueue(pool, rqstp);
>
> --
> 1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-04 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-26 15:09 Andriy Skulysh
2013-01-04 0:53 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-01-06 22:12 ` Andriy Skulysh
2013-01-08 21:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130104005345.GA4407@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=andriy_skulysh@xyratex.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome