From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: remove synchronize_rcu() from cgroup_attach_{task|proc}()
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:42:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130114184236.GF27942@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F3CE8E.5000402@huawei.com>
Hey, Li.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 05:23:26PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> These 2 syncronize_rcu()s make attaching a task to a cgroup
> quite slow, and it can't be ignored in some situations.
>
> A real case from Colin Cross: Android uses cgroups heavily to
> manage thread priorities, putting threads in a background group
> with reduced cpu.shares when they are not visible to the user,
> and in a foreground group when they are. Some RPCs from foreground
> threads to background threads will temporarily move the background
> thread into the foreground group for the duration of the RPC.
> This results in many calls to cgroup_attach_task.
>
> In cgroup_attach_task() it's task->cgroups that is protected by RCU,
> and put_css_set() calls kfree_rcu() to free it.
>
> If we remove this synchronize_rcu(), there can be threads in RCU-read
> sections accessing their old cgroup via current->cgroups with
> concurrent rmdir operation, but this is safe.
Yeah, these synchronize_rcu()s are utterly confused.
synchornize_rcu() necessarily have to come between two operations to
guarantee that the changes made before it are visible to all rcu
readers before proceeding beyond it. Here, synchornize_rcu() are at
the end of attach operations with nothing beyond it. Duh.... its only
effect would be delaying completion of write(2) to sysfs tasks/procs
files until all rcu readers see the change, which is utterly
irrelevant. It doesn't mean anything.
Applying to cgroup/for-3.9.
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-14 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-14 9:23 Li Zefan
2013-01-14 9:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: remove synchronize_rcu() from rebind_subsystems() Li Zefan
2013-01-14 18:55 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-14 18:55 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-14 18:42 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130114184236.GF27942@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ccross@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®