From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755308Ab3AQTUp (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:20:45 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35246 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751814Ab3AQTUo (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:20:44 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: rh Subject: Re: [PATCH 76/86] fs/btrfs: remove depends on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:20:30 -0800 Message-ID: <20130117112030.6fa36b08cdf227c8c6e6f7b3@lavabit.com> References: <1358391258-1771-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> <1358391258-1771-77-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-227-87-145.sb.sd.cox.net User-Agent: dsodnetnin X-Mailer: EZnn0.37p X-Newsreader: EZnn0.37p X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: EZnn0.37p Original-Received: from slem by 1.1 with local X-No-Archive: yes Archive: no X-Archive: expiry=11 X-Archive: encrypt X-Operating-System: Barebones_6.1 X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.168.1.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:54:08 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > The CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL config item has not carried much meaning for a > while now and is almost always enabled by default. As agreed during > the Linux kernel summit, remove it from any "depends on" lines in > Kconfigs. > > Cc: Chris Mason > Cc: Al Viro > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > --- > fs/btrfs/Kconfig | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/Kconfig b/fs/btrfs/Kconfig > index d33f01c..ccd25ba 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/Kconfig > +++ b/fs/btrfs/Kconfig > @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ > config BTRFS_FS > - tristate "Btrfs filesystem (EXPERIMENTAL) Unstable disk > format" > - depends on EXPERIMENTAL > + tristate "Btrfs filesystem Unstable disk format" No longer an experiment but still "Unstable". But is it broken? Or is it staging or a pet? >>From my naive point of view it seems like this set of patches is unleashing a bunch of bad stuff onto anyone that actually sets CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL "n". But I guess it's supposed to get caught in linux-next. > select LIBCRC32C > select ZLIB_INFLATE > select ZLIB_DEFLATE > -- > 1.7.9.5 > --