From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755200Ab3ARTuJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:50:09 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:39021 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750867Ab3ARTuH (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:50:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:50:05 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20130118.145005.156366015893075594.davem@davemloft.net> To: tstdenis@elliptictech.com Cc: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <396283550.90353.1358537733820.JavaMail.root@elliptictech.com> References: <20130116062104.GA18940@secunet.com> <396283550.90353.1358537733820.JavaMail.root@elliptictech.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Tom St Denis Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:35:33 -0500 (EST) > Any "maintainers" going to reply to this at all? What do you mean? There was a reply, and the reply if someone so skilled finds this facility useful they can feel free to submit an implementation. You can't force people to work on something they have no interest in, especially when it's effectively a new feature.